• Advertisement
To advertise, place classifieds free ads by category in a forum as a new topic, or in the classified display ads section, or start a classifieds free blog.

Nancy Pelosi: Biden will win ‘whatever the end count is on Tuesday’

ELECTION FRAUD: Illegal Router Connecting Tabulation Machines To Internet Discovered In Michigan

Postby smix » Mon Nov 09, 2020 4:33 am

ELECTION FRAUD: Illegal Router Connecting Tabulation Machines To Internet Discovered In Michigan
The Truth Is Vital - Bobby Powell

URL: http://bobpowell.blogspot.com/2020/11/e ... outer.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 5, 2020

Description: TTiV/WCHY 97.7 Exclusive
Former Michigan State Senator and gubernatorial candidate Patrick Colbeck, acting as a poll challenger in Detroit, has discovered a hidden router connecting tabulation machines to the internet. This is how coup plotters were able to use #Scorecard and #Hammer, programs created by the CIA to influence elections in other countries, to steal the #Election2020 from #POTUS. Hear a first-hand, eyewitness account of the discovery of this highly illegal dirty trick in this episode of The Truth Is Viral.

UPDATE From The "No F'ing Way" Department: Paul Pelosi, husband of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, sits on the board of, and owns a majority of stock in, Dominion Voting Systems, the firm tallying the votes in 30 different states.
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

A Closer Look at Dominion Voting Systems

Postby smix » Tue Nov 10, 2020 9:37 pm

A Closer Look at Dominion Voting Systems
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/a-closer- ... 72675.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 9, 2020

Description: Dominion Voting Systems dominates voting machines. It holds a third of the voting-machine market. Its software was used in all swing states this year, including Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Nevada.

During a Fox interview over the weekend, former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell pointed out that Senator Feinstein’s husband, Richard Bloom, is a shareholder of Dominion Voting Systems. The software company also has ties to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Her former chief of staff is one of the lobbyists on the company’s first-ever lobbying firm—Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. In Michigan, the software was partially to blame for the 6,000 votes being awarded to the wrong candidate in Michigan’s Antrim County. A skewed result initially saw Biden winning the traditionally red county, but when corrected, the results showed that President Donald Trump had won. The Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy initially attributed the problem to a combination of a software glitch and human error. But just today, county officials backpedaled on the statement, saying the Dominion software had no part in the mistake, now blaming the problem solely on human error. Michigan wasn’t the only state where problems were connected to Dominion. In two Georgia counties, the night before the election, two voting machines crashed. Voters in Morgan and Spalding counties couldn’t cast ballots for hours after the crash, delaying vote counts that eventually went in favor of Trump. Elections supervisor for Spalding County said the company “uploaded something on November 2nd or the night before election day, which is not something that’s normally ever done, and it caused a glitch.”

More Than 10,000 Dead People Cast Ballots in Michigan, Analysis Shows
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/10000-dea ... 73209.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 10, 2020

Description: More than 10,000 people confirmed or suspected dead have returned their mail-in ballots to vote in Michigan, according to an analysis of the state’s election data. About 9,500 voters confirmed dead through the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) are marked in the state’s mail voting database as having returned ballots. Another nearly 2,000 are 100 years old or more and aren’t listed as known living centenarians. The analysis was provided by Richard Baris, director of Big Data Poll. The data indicates that somebody else was trying to vote on behalf of these people. “It’s also entirely possible that some of them aren’t even real people,” Baris told The Epoch Times via email. “If someone is 110 or some ridiculous age, we should have their death record but do not.” Americans older than 110 are exceedingly rare; only a handful of such seniors are known to live in Michigan. According to the 2010 Census, there were 1,729 centenarians in Michigan. Even if somebody tried to vote on behalf of a deceased person, the vote would be rejected, according to Tracy Wimmer, spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state. “Ballots of voters who have died are rejected in Michigan, even if the voter cast an absentee ballot and then died before Election Day,” she previously told The Epoch Times via email. However, Baris isn’t convinced. “While I’m open to the idea some of these have been rejected, I’m not open to any outright dismissal they all were rejected,” he said in a Nov. 8 tweet. The data on how many ballots were rejected isn’t available yet, Wimmer said. She said that “a ballot received for a living voter may be recorded in a way that makes it appear as if the voter is dead.” “This can be because of voters with similar names, where the ballot is accidentally recorded as voted by John Smith Sr., when it was actually voted by John Smith Jr., or because of inaccurately recorded birth dates in the qualified voter file.” This only happens “on rare occasions,” she said. Democratic nominee Joe Biden leads in Michigan by less than 150,000 votes. The Trump campaign filed a lawsuit in Michigan to halt vote counting until Republican observers are granted adequate access. The GOP-led Michigan legislature is investigating allegations of election irregularities in the state. In a Nov. 9 lawsuit, a Detroit poll watcher alleged thousands of mail-in ballots from people who weren’t properly registered to vote were added to vote counts. Poll operators were adding names and addresses to the poll book with made-up birth dates, such as 1/1/1900, he said in a sworn affidavit. Baris said the mail voting data he worked from likely isn’t up to date enough to capture any irregularities that happened Election Day and after. “If they did that on Election Day in Michigan, then we likely wouldn’t know until December,” he said. “If it is true, then they’d, unfortunately, get away with it in the short-term.” President Donald Trump is challenging the results of the elections in several states where Biden holds a tight lead. The Trump campaign is alleging invalid ballots were counted for Democrats, valid ballots were thrown away for Republicans, and Republican ballot watchers were prevented from meaningfully observing the vote-counting process.

Tens of Thousands of Pennsylvania Ballots Returned Earlier Than Sent Date: Researcher
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylva ... 72942.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 10, 2020

Description: More than 20,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have impossible return dates and another more than 80,000 have return dates that raise questions, according to a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database. Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date. The state’s voter records are being scrutinized as President Donald Trump is challenging the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania and other states where his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, holds a tight lead. The Trump campaign is alleging that invalid ballots have been counted for Democrats and valid ballots for Republicans were thrown away. The analysis of the publicly available data was conducted by a data researcher who submitted it first to the Chinese-language edition of The Epoch Times. The researcher, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he consulted about the matter with several USPS field engineers, who said the return dates shown in the database are “impossible.” The dataset made public by Pennsylvania’s secretary of state was last updated on Nov. 10, and “describes a current state of mail ballot requests for the 2020 General Election.” The data includes the mailed-out and return dates. In Pennsylvania, voters must request a ballot, which is sent to them via USPS. The voter then fills out the document and sends it back via mail or returns it in person. The process usually takes several days or even weeks, depending on the speed of delivery and response by the voter. This year, Pennsylvania also allowed voters to “request, receive, mark and cast your mail-in or absentee ballot all in one visit to your county election office or other designated location.” That may explain the ballots with no sent date—they may have been received and cast in person. While it could also explain the ballots with the same sent and returned date, that appears to clash with the description of the database, which says the sent date is “the date the county confirmed the application to queue a ballot label to mail the ballot materials to the voter.” If the ballot was received by the voter in person, there would have been no need for a mailing label. “Since October 1, the average time of delivery for First-Class Mail, including ballots, was 2.5 days,” USPS said in an Oct. 29 release. Impossible and improbable return dates indicate there’s something wrong with either the database or the ballots. The Office of Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State didn’t immediately respond to requests by The Epoch Times for comment. In addition to the ballots described above, there were more than 43,000 ballots returned two days after being sent out, which is still remarkably fast, although still possible if the voter quickly delivered the ballot to an election office or a ballot drop box in person. The flagged ballots comprise almost 4 percent of all those issued by the state. According to the data analyzed by the researcher, at least 31 people who appear to be older than the oldest known person in the state returned ballots. They were all born between 1900 and 1907, based on the state’s data. The oldest known person in the state is 113-year-old Ardith Grose. About 20 of the voters shared the birth date of Jan. 1, 1900. The date corresponds to an allegation in Michigan, where a poll watcher said he saw operators adding people to the poll book while they were counting their mail-in ballots, raising concern that these voters weren’t properly registered and thus were eligible to vote. The operators input the names with fabricated birth dates, such as Jan. 1, 1900, according to a sworn affidavit by the poll watcher. Another analysis of the Pennsylvania data showed that the extremely old voters were mostly registered Democrats.

Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell: ‘We’re Getting Ready to Overturn Election Results in Multiple States’
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/t ... 79599.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 15, 2020

Description: Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that the president’s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities. “We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said on Fox Business, adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up.” Powell claimed that elections software switched “millions of votes” from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Powell is notably the counsel to former national security advisor Michael Flynn, engineering a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges. Powell said a whistleblower has come forward alleging that the voting software was designed to “rig elections.” “He saw it happen in other countries,” she said, apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines. “We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.” She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo. “They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” Powell said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything. “We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell said. Powell also referred to a 2019 investigation by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems. “(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago. “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.” Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems. During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.


Companies Respond
The Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity agency issued a statement on Thursday calling the 2020 general election the “most secure in American history,” despite legal challenges alleging voting irregularities in some battleground states. “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” read the statement released by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Smartmatic, in a statement on Saturday, said that it has no ties with Dominion Voting Systems. Powell suggested that Smartmatic is operated by Dominion in the interview. Dominion, over the past several weeks, has repeatedly denied its systems were compromised in some way. “In the aftermath of the 2020 general election, there has been a great deal of misinformation being circulated about Smartmatic and other companies that provide election technology to voting jurisdictions in the US. We would like to dispel these incorrect statements with facts,” the firm wrote, adding that it “has never owned any shares or had any financial stake in Dominion Voting Systems.” Dominion also refuted allegations that its machines changed votes from Trump to Biden on Election Day and beyond. “Dominion Voting Systems categorically denies any claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems,” a company spokesperson said in a statement to The Denver Post. “Our systems continue to reliably and accurately count ballots, and state and local election authorities have publicly confirmed the integrity of the process.”

Whistleblower Alleges Software Manipulated Votes to Change Venezuelan Election Results
The Epoch Times

URL: https://theepochtimes.com/whistleblower ... 81769.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 17, 2020

Description: WASHINGTON—Trump campaign lawyer and former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell released an affidavit on Nov. 16, from an alleged whistleblower who claims to have witnessed how election software secretly manipulates votes without leaving a trace. The whistleblower—who says his or her background is with the Venezuelan military, including the national security guard detail of the Venezuelan president—outlines an alleged conspiracy between Smartmatic software executives, former Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, and that country’s election officials, to ensure Chavez won reelections and retained power for years.


The whistleblower said he was present at multiple meetings. The Epoch Times was not able to independently verify the claims. “I was witness to the creation and operation of a sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to gain and maintain their power,” the affidavit states. “From that point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.” The whistleblower claimed the “software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the Smartmatic Electoral Management System.” “In short, the Smartmatic software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company’s software and system,” the whistleblower said. The affidavit alleges that Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the United States. Powell said in a Nov. 15 interview, “We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states.” She claimed that the U.S. election software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Biden. The whistleblower claims that Smartmatic created a system that anonymized the voters’ choices inside the machine and then spat out the desired outcome by the end of the election day. No vote could be traced back to an individual voter. In the April 2013 Venezuelan election, the affidavit states, the conspirators had to take the internet down for two hours to reset the machines, as Nicolás Maduro was losing by too many votes to Henrique Capriles Radonski. The whistleblower alleged that Chavez eventually exported the software to Bolivia, Nicaragua, Argentina, Ecuador, and Chile. A Dominion Voting Systems spokesperson said on Nov. 12 that the company “categorically denies any claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems.” “Our systems continue to reliably and accurately count ballots, and state and local election authorities have publicly confirmed the integrity of the process,” the spokesperson said in a statement to the Denver Post.

Georgia Monitor Catches 9,626-Vote Error in Hand Recount
The Epoch Times

URL: https://m.theepochtimes.com/georgia-mon ... 84168.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 18, 2020

Description: A recount monitor in Georgia discovered a 9,626-vote error in the hand recount in DeKalb County, according to the chairman of the Georgia Republican Party. “One of our monitors discovered a 9,626-vote error in the DeKalb County hand count. One batch was labeled 10,707 for Biden and 13 for Trump—an improbable margin even by DeKalb standards. The actual count for the batch was 1,081 for Biden and 13 for Trump,” David Shafer wrote on Twitter on Nov. 18. “Had this counting error not been discovered, Biden would have gained enough votes from this one batch alone to cancel out Trump’s gains from Fayette, Floyd, and Walton,” Shafer added, referring to the three Peach State counties that discovered memory cards with uncounted votes on Nov. 16 and 17. The discovered votes favored President Donald Trump and cut former Vice President Joe Biden’s lead in the state by more than 1,400 votes. Shafer said that two official counters signed off on the miscounted batch. Republican attorneys turned over an affidavit (pdf) on the incident to the Georgia secretary of state and requested an investigation. “We were limited to one monitor for every 10 counting tables and we were kept some distance from the tables. There is no telling what we missed under these unreasonable restrictions,” Shafer said. Georgia’s deadline to complete the recount is 11:59 p.m. on Nov. 18. The state is scheduled to vote on whether to certify the results of the 2020 election on Nov. 20. The recount in progress was initiated by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, based on a new law that calls for an audit of one race after each election. The Trump campaign has challenged the recount process, asserting that it is meaningless unless it includes an audit of the voters’ signatures. The office of the secretary of state didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment. Georgia officials are probing the handling of the presidential election in the state’s largest county. Officials are seeing “managerial sloppiness” and “chain of custody” issues in Fulton County, which has a population of about a million and includes Atlanta, Gabriel Sterling with the secretary of state’s office told reporters on Nov. 17. Raffensperger said on Nov. 17 that an audit of voting machines was completed with no signs of foul play. Voting systems testing company Pro V&V conducted the audit and “found no evidence of the machines being tampered.” The Trump campaign has alleged that voting machines and software by Dominion Voting Systems switched votes from Trump to Biden. Dominion has denied the allegation.

Sidney Powell Suit Makes 30 Allegations in Bid to Invalidate Georgia Election Results
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/sidney-po ... 95129.html
Category: Legal
Published: November 26, 2020

Description: A lawsuit released by lawyers led by former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell makes 30 allegations of electoral fraud and other illegal and irregular activities and features pertaining to the 2020 general elections in Georgia (pdf). The allegations, most of which are based on witness and expert statements, relate to mail-in ballot fraud and insecurities, recount irregularities and deficiencies, and security hazards of the Dominion Voting Systems machines used by the state. The suit alleges the following:
1. The software used by the Dominion machines was accessed by agents of malicious actors, such as China and Iran, “in order to monitor and manipulate elections,” including the 2020 election. The allegation is based on a redacted declaration of a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence. “By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020,” the suit says.
2. An affiant, whose name was redacted for security reasons, alleged that the software used by Dominion was designed for Venezuelan government with the specific purpose to rig elections without the risk of getting caught. The affiant said he was part of a national security detail to former Venezuelan socialist dictator Hugo Chavez. “The purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to maintain control of the government,” he said. The allegation was corroborated by another witness who “was in an official position related to elections and witnessed manipulations of petitions to prevent a removal of President Chavez.”
3. Another affiant said he’s the cousin of the former chief executive of Smartmatic, the company that developed the software adopted by Dominion. He said he has personal knowledge that the executive manipulated the company “to ensure the election for Chavez in the 2004 Referendum in Venezuela,” the suit says. He also testified that the executive, Anthony Mugica, “received tens of millions of dollars from 2003–2015 from the Venezuelan government to ensure Smartmatic technology would be implemented around the world, including in the U.S.,” the suit says.
4. The vote tallies produced by the Dominion machines can be manipulated by imputing a malicious code with just “7 minutes alone with [the voting machine] and a screwdriver,” according to Andrew Appel, Princeton professor of computer science and election security expert.
5. A ballot can be spoiled or altered by the Dominion machine because “the ballot marking printer is in the same paper path as the mechanism to deposit marked ballots into an attached ballot box,” a study by University of California–Berkeley said. It indicates that after a voter submits a ballot to the machine, the machine can add additional marks on it.
6.. The voting machines are susceptible to hacking or remote tampering because they are connected to the internet, even though they’re not supposed to be. “Voting machines were able to be connected to the internet by way of laptops that were obviously internet accessible,” the suit says. “If one laptop was connected to the internet, the entire precinct was compromised.” Affiant Hari Hursti, a Finnish computer programmer and election security expert, said, “There is evidence of remote access and remote troubleshooting, which presents a grave security implication.”
7. The voting machines have activity logs that can be overwritten, according to Hursti. That means hackers or malevolent operators can tamper with the results and then erase their steps.
8. Ronald Watkins, a software and cyber-security expert who reviewed the Dominion software manual, said the machine operators can change the setting to exclude certain ballots from being counted (based on how much of the “bubble” they had filled in to indicate a vote for a candidate). Scans of the excluded ballots are placed in a separate folder and the operator can delete them simply using Windows File Manager.
9. Watkins said that to report the final vote counts, the machine operator would copy and paste the “Results” folder from the machine onto a USB drive. “While a simple procedure, this process may be error-prone and is very vulnerable to malicious administrators,” he said.
10. There are no procedures that would ensure the security of the USB drives used to report vote tallies from precincts. In one Georgia County, 3,300 votes were found on memory sticks not loaded into the central vote tally system, the suit says.
11. The test report and secretary of state certificate for the voting machines are undated.
12. Smartmatic faces litigation over “glitches” that allegedly affected the 2010 and 2013 mid-term elections in the Philippines, “raising questions of cheating and fraud,” the suit says.
13. Between 31,559 and 38,886 absentee ballots were returned by Republican voters, but were not counted, according to an analysis by expert witness Williams Briggs, a statistician and former Cornell Medical School professor, based on a phone survey of potentially affected GOP voters by the team of former Trump campaign member Matt Braynard.
14. Between 16,938 and 22,771 Republican voters received absentee ballots they didn’t request, based on the same analysis. That indicates unlawful absentee requests, the suit alleges.
15. Based on Braynard’s analysis of voter registrations and change-of-address requests, 20,311 absentee or early voters in Georgia voted even though they had moved out of state, which the state prohibits.
16. Georgia entered into an unlawful consent agreement with Democratic Party agencies that gutted the effectiveness of matching signatures on absentee ballot envelopes with signatures on record with the authorities. The matching was reduced “to a broad process with discretion, rather than enforcement of the signature requirement as statutorily required,” the suit says. The signature matching procedure was influenced by “guidance and training materials” produced by the Democratic Party.
17. Gov. Brian Kemp illegally authorized election officials to open outer envelopes of absentee ballots three weeks before the election. Georgia law “clearly prohibits opening absentee ballots prior to election day,” the suit says.
18. Georgia’s hand recount of the presidential race was illegitimate for a lack of meaningful observation. “Democrat-majority counties provided political parties and candidates, including the Trump Campaign, no meaningful access or actual opportunity to review and assess the validity of mail-in ballots during the pre-canvassing meetings,” the suit says. The allegation is based on multiple recount observer testimonies.
19. Votes for President Donald Trump were placed during the recount into vote piles for Trump’s opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden. The allegation is based on multiple observer testimonies, as well as an undercover video produced by Project Veritas, an undercover journalism nonprofit.
20. Some ballots from the “No Vote” and “Jorgensen” trays were moved to the “Biden” tray. One witness made the allegation.
21. Many voters weren’t allowed to cancel their mail-in ballot on Election Day and vote in person. One witness made the allegation.
22. The same witness alleged that many voters were denied the option to cast a provisional ballot on Election Day “when a mail-in ballot has already been received for them, but when they did not cast those mail-in ballots,” the suit says.
23. Signatures on mail-in ballot envelopes weren’t verified during the recount, one witness alleged. “At no time did I witness any Recounter or individual participate in the recount verifying signatures [on mail-in ballots],” the affiant said.
24. Some counties didn’t actually recount the ballots by hand, but instead used machines.
25. One batch of ballots was suspiciously “pristine.” Almost all were for Biden. The allegation is based on an observer testimony, who professed “20 years of experience of handling ballots.” One batch of ballots “was pristine” and “there was a difference in the texture of the paper,” according to the witness. “I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device,” she said. The ballots also “included a slight depressed pre-fold so they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning machines.”
26. The same witness also alleged that at one precinct in Milton, Georgia, poll workers were “asked to sign the chain of custody letter on Sunday, even though the machines were not delivered until 2:00 AM in the morning on Election Day.” In addition, the machines “were not sealed or locked, the serial numbers were not what were reflected on the related documentation,” she said.
27. Many batches of ballots were “100% for Biden,” one witness alleged.
28. The same witness also alleged “that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.” Local elections director offered the explanation that the ballots in question came from a different printer.
29. Authorities lied by claiming vote counting was paused in Fulton County because of “a water leak affecting the room where absentee ballots were being tabulated.” “The only water leak that needed repairs at State Farm Arena from November 3 – November 5 was a toilet overflow that occurred earlier on November 3. It had nothing to do with a room with ballot counting,” the suit says.
30. After everyone was “sent home,” one witness “saw election workers remaining behind after people were told to leave, the suit says, alleging that several people stayed behind to continue counting ballots without any observers present.
The lawsuit asks the court to order Georgia to do the following:
1. de-certify the election results
2. not transmit the currently certified election results to the Electoral College
3. transmit instead certified election results that state that Trump is the winner of the election
4. impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the plaintiffs
5. not count votes received or tabulated by machines that weren’t certified as required by federal and state law
6. produce 36 hours of security camera footage of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County

Election Findings Could ‘Easily’ Overturn 3 States, Data Analyst Concludes
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/election- ... 95153.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 26, 2020

Description: WASHINGTON—The former data and strategy director for President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign says he has found enough evidence to suggest the election results could be “easily” turned to favor the current president. “I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election, based on our findings,” Matt Braynard said in a Nov. 25 video. “He may have won, he may not have won. Trump may have lost, Trump may have been reelected. “We just can’t know because of how bad this election system has operated.” Braynard assembled a team just days after the election to look for inconsistencies in six contested states: Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada. The group initially identified 1.25 million voter issues and followed up on them through phone calls and by cross-checking data against other databases. The team ran several major analyses including of voters who had moved out of state but still voted in the state they had left; voters who registered to vote using a post office box number rather than a residential address as required; voters who requested a mail-in ballot and sent it in, only for it not to be counted; voters who didn’t request a mail-in ballot and didn’t receive one, but discovered a vote had been cast in their name; as well as research on people who voted more than once and on those who are listed in the death index.

Change of Address
One of Braynard’s biggest findings involved voters who had submitted a National Change of Address form to the post office, indicating they had moved out of state, yet appeared to have voted in 2020 in the state they moved from. In Georgia, the team found 138,221 such people, which represents a much larger number than the state’s current vote differential (12,670) in the presidential race. In Michigan, there were 51,302 such people; Wisconsin had 26,673, Nevada had 27,271, Arizona had 19,997, and Pennsylvania had 13,671. Braynard said the numbers are high enough that they could “easily” overturn current election projections. The number of questionable ballots surpasses the vote margin in at least three states right now—Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin,” Braynard told The Epoch Times on Nov. 25. Those three states have a combined total of 37 electoral votes. “This isn’t speculative. This is just what the data shows.” The current vote count difference between the two main presidential candidates and the electoral votes involved are as follows:
Arizona: 10,457 votes (11 electoral votes)
Georgia: 12,670 votes (16 electoral votes)
Nevada: 33,596 votes (6 electoral votes)
Michigan: 154,188 votes (16 electoral votes)
Pennsylvania: 80,555 votes (20 electoral votes)
Wisconsin: 20,608 votes (10 electoral votes)
Braynard said the team also found people who had voted more than once. However, he suggested the numbers his team found are likely much lower than the actual numbers, as he was unable to run the data against the numbers of in-person, Election Day voters. The number of early and absentee double voters in Nevada and Pennsylvania was roughly 750 people, while in the other four contested states, it ranged from 150 to 400 people. Braynard said the analyses his team conducted don’t require any leap of faith or trust in some “magical mathematical formula.” “I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state,” Braynard told The Epoch Times. “And I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast early or absentee ballots back in Georgia. I can show you the names of the people and the records of them having voted in multiple states and the raw data that the states make available.” Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar’s office previously said it has found no evidence of voter fraud or mass irregularities in Pennsylvania, while secretaries of state in Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan have said the same. Early last week, the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity division said the Nov. 3 election was the “most secure” in U.S. history, saying there is “no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” Trump’s legal team, however, has said it found enough evidence to potentially overturn the election. Braynard said he has signed declarations to go with his work, which is being used in court filings in five states. Using Braynard’s findings, a legal group on Nov. 25 filed a lawsuit in Georgia alleging that more than 150,000 illegal votes were counted. The suit also alleges that 43,688 legal votes weren’t counted.
Post Office Boxes
Again in Georgia, Braynard found a further 1,000 people who registered to vote by using a post office box number, but attempted to disguise the box number as an apartment or suite number.
When registering to vote, by law, individuals must use their actual residential address as their residence. A P.O. box number can only be used as a mailing address. Homeless people can list a shelter, a soup kitchen, or even a parking lot as their residence. “So rather than saying, ‘P.O. Box 123,’ the address is listed as ‘Apartment 123,'” Braynard said, “and that’s a major red flag.” In Pennsylvania, the group found 1,400 such voters. He said almost all of those people voted early or absentee, rather than in person—at a rate far higher than the overall average. “So that really raises a red flag because they’re illegally registered,” he said. “It sounds like a good problem for the FBI to solve.” Braynard said he intends to share his findings with state law enforcement and the FBI.
Mail-In Ballot Issues
The 2020 election saw an astronomical increase in mail-in balloting, which has been deemed as the most ripest for fraud. Nine states and the District of Columbia sent ballots to everyone on their voter rolls, whether they requested them or not. Five of the six contested states that Braynard looked at required a voter to request a mail-in ballot, while Nevada mailed out ballots to everyone on its voter registration rolls. In the five states that required a requested ballot, Braynard’s team found a significant number of people whom the state marked as having requested a ballot but not having returned it. Upon contacting those people, Braynard said many of them told his call team that they hadn’t requested a ballot at all. Others said they had requested and returned the ballot, but it hadn’t been marked as received or counted. In Arizona, 44 percent of the people reached by phone said they hadn’t requested a mail-in ballot, despite the state receiving a completed ballot in their name. In Michigan, that number was 24 percent; in Pennsylvania, 32 percent; and in Wisconsin and Georgia, 18 percent. “Those are pretty startling numbers, because the question is, how? How did that ballot get requested? Who did that? Is it possible that people we talked to maybe lied to us or maybe did it and forgot about it? Was there a clerical error that could be this substantial?” said Braynard. “Once they stripped those ballots out of those absentee envelopes, it becomes very difficult to come up with a real remedy.” Within the group of people who did request a mail-in ballot, but the ballot was flagged as unreturned, between 15 percent and 33 percent of the people reached said they had actually returned their ballot. In Pennsylvania, more than 160,000 uncounted mail-in ballots were requested by or in the name of registered Republicans. Braynard said he hopes his findings will help bring greater scrutiny to the election process, in particular the verification process of mail-in ballots (he suggests fingerprints instead of signatures), clean voter rolls, and the availability of open-source voting machine data. “It’s unfortunate, but short of a judge ordering a do-over, another election … short of that, I really don’t see how you fix this,” Braynard said. “This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly questionable. They’re anomalous. “I cannot say with confidence who won this election. I don’t think anybody can.”

Powell Lawsuit in Michigan Alleges ‘Dominion Computer Fraud’ and ‘Illegal Conduct’ by Election Workers
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/sidney-po ... 94298.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 26, 2020

Description: Similar lawsuit also released in Georgia, yet to be filed
Attorney Sidney Powell filed a lawsuit late Wednesday seeking to set aside the results of the election in Michigan, claiming that “hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate, or purely fictitious ballots” enabled by “massive election fraud” helped make possible Biden’s vote count lead in the state. The suit also pointed to multiple issues pertaining to Dominion Voting Systems. The attorney, who previously worked with President Donald Trump’s legal team, also released late Wednesday a separate lawsuit intended to be filed in Georgia with allegations of voting irregularities and fraud. She announced on Twitter that the “Kraken” had been released in both states, with exhibits to follow. The 75-page complaint (pdf) filed in Michigan alleges “massive election fraud” throughout the state in violation of Michigan’s Elections Code and the U.S. Constitution. “The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as president of the United States,” the suit alleges. It adds that fraud was committed in many ways, but the most “troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy” involved “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned ‘ballot-stuffing.'” The complaint alleges “an especially egregious range of conduct” in Wayne County and the City of Detroit and similar conduct throughout the state, which it attributes to direction from Michigan state election officials. It notes that the “same pattern of election fraud and voter fraud writ large occurred in all the swing states with only minor variations” in Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Wisconsin. The complaint cites eyewitness and expert testimony to allege that there were enough ballots identified to overturn and reverse the election results. It also says results of the election cannot be relied on because the entire election process was “riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility.” The suit claims that election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers helped facilitate the fraud. “The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States,” the complaint reads. “Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was needed to make certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election,” it adds, citing a whistleblower’s affidavit alleging that the Smartmatic software was used to manipulate Venezuelan elections in favor of Chavez. “A core requirement of the Smartmatic software design ultimately adopted by Dominion for Michigan’s elections was the software’s ability to hide its manipulation of votes from any audit,” the complaint alleges. The complaint cites a former electronic intelligence analyst under the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion, who declared that the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran to monitor and manipulate elections, including the 2020 U.S. general election. Another part of the complaint says that a former U.S. Military Intelligence expert had analyzed the Dominion software system and concluded that the system and software “were certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.” “By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020,” the filing reads. It later adds, “In addition to the Dominion computer fraud, this complaint identifies several additional categories of ‘traditional’ voting fraud and Michigan Election Code violations, supplemented by healthy doses of harassment, intimidation, discrimination, abuse, and even physical removal of Republican poll challengers to eliminate any semblance of transparency, objectivity, or fairness from the vote-counting process.” The lawsuit is filed against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Michigan board of state canvassers. Plaintiffs in the civil action are six registered Michigan voters and nominees of the Republican Party to the electoral college. The Michigan secretary of state and Dominion Voting Systems did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ requests for comment on the lawsuit. Dominion released a statement on Wednesday saying: “Claims that Dominion deleted or switched votes are completely false. Dominion systems are 100 percent auditable.” Michigan’s Board of Canvassers voted to certify the state’s election late Monday. President Donald Trump’s lawyer Jenna Ellis said at the time that certifications issued by state officials of the presidential election are merely a “procedural step.” There are two pending lawsuits in Michigan. The Trump campaign has a lawsuit in the state that is pending appeal by the Michigan Court of Appeals. It is unclear if the appeal will stand given that Michigan has certified the election results. A separate third-party lawsuit is on appeal before the Michigan Supreme Court.

Digital Forensic Analysis Shows Dominion’s Server Connected to Iran and China: Affidavit
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/digital-f ... 95892.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 27, 2020

Description: A digital forensic analysis by a former military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit accompanying attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials, claims to present “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.” Powell’s complaint, filed on Nov. 25 against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Michigan Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit (pdf) as authored by a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence and purporting to show that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.” A separate complaint in Georgia, expands on the assertion, claiming that, “by using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020.” The analyst, who claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another forensic review confirmed links to an Iranian IP address, the analyst wrote, and concluded that the totality of “these scanning behaviors showed that foreign agents of aggressor nations had access to US voter lists, and had done so recently.” The analyst said the findings represent a “complete failure” on the part of Dominion to provide “basic cyber security.” “This is not a technological issue, but rather a governance and basic security issue: if it is not corrected, future elections in the United States and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results,” the analyst concluded. Dominion has not responded to a query from The Epoch Times regarding the allegations, although the company issued a statement on Wednesday, the same day Powell filed the Michigan lawsuit, with Dominion saying there were “unfounded allegations being made against the company and its voting systems” in recent days. The company added: “Dominion voting systems are designed and certified by the U.S. government to be closed and do not rely on network connectivity. Dominion’s tabulators also do not have exposed USB or other memory ports.” It came after Powell alleged in her lawsuit that “hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate, or purely fictitious ballots” were enabled by “massive election fraud.” The suit claimed that election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers helped facilitate the fraud.“The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States,” the complaint reads. Dominion said that it has no financial or organizational ties to Smartmatic, although it said it purchased assets from a company formerly owned by Smartmatic. Both Dominion and Smartmatic have denied ties to foreign governments.

Questionable Votes Exceed Margin: Analyst
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/questiona ... 96798.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 28, 2020

Description: A data analyst performed 35 experiments in 5 states regarding voter data in the presidential election. According to his findings, in at least three of the states the number of questionable or potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.
The leader of the Voter Integrity Project and former Trump Data and Strategy Director, Matt Braynard, explained his findings in an interview with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp.

Braynard said he found over 1,000 voters in Georgia who listed themselves at addresses that are post offices or other facilities the Postal Service leases or owns like FedEx or UPS stores. They also disguised their PO boxes as apartments. Matt Braynard: “So rather than saying PO box 123, the address is listed as Apartment 123. And that’s a major red flag. And what’s also remarkable about these individuals, is that almost all of them voted early absentee, very few voted in person. So that really raises a red flag because they’re illegally registered. And it’s—and not just incidentally, but intentionally meant to deceive by listing suite number or unit number rather than technically what it is, which is a box number.”
Update: - Sample of the postal facilities (USPS, FedEx, UPS) addresses disguised as apartments, etc. in Georgia. I will release the full dataset for GA and PA with the package that includes the survey toplines, etc.


-- Matt Braynard (@MattBraynard) November 24, 2020

For example, a voter listed his or her address as 724 Charlie Smith Senior Highway, Saint Marys, Georgia, Apartment 5402. According to the Federal Voting Assistance Program, when requesting an absentee ballot, a PO box cannot be used as a mailing address. Now on to Pennsylvania. Braynard had teams call people the state marked as having received a ballot request, but from whom the state never got the actual ballot. In other words people who supposedly requested a ballot, but it never arrived to be counted in their name. Matt Braynard: “The first question we asked is, did you actually request that ballot? And in many cases, they said no, which is a big red flag because somebody had to request that ballot. And by law, it had to be them or somebody that they designated legally to do so.” Here is an example of a call his team made to a Pennsylvania resident. “We show that *BLEEP* in the state of Pennsylvania is marked as having received an absentee ballot request from you but did not receive your absentee ballot. Did you request an absentee ballot?” Resident: “No.” The second question they asked was if the voter returned the ballot. Many (who did receive a ballot) said yes, which Braynard says is a red flag because the state did not receive it and their vote was not counted. Matt Braynard: “We’re hoping that by making this State discovery that will lead to judicial remedies that could bring greater scrutiny to the election such as signature evaluation or manual recounts, as well as law enforcement to look into exactly who requested those ballots. And then, if the people did mail them back in, or why they didn’t get counted, why they didn’t make it to the clerk’s office.” Braynard says his analysis should have been done before the election by cleaning up voter rolls to remove ineligible voters—and during the election by objecting to ballots that should not be counted. He says once the ballots are taken out of the absentee envelopes, it’s hard to remedy the problem, short of a judge ordering a complete do-over of the election.

Poll Challenger, Dominion Contractor Say Voting Machines in Detroit Were Connected to Internet
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/poll-chal ... 97825.html
Category: Politics
Published: November 30, 2020

Description: DETROIT—A contractor for Dominion Voting Systems who performed IT work at the TCF Center in Michigan and a former state senator who was a poll challenger both say that the voting machines used in the Nov. 3 election were connected to the internet. Melissa Carone—a freelance IT worker who submitted a sworn affidavit on Nov. 10 detailing a barrage of what she called fraudulent actions during her time at the voting center—said she was called into a hotel in Allen Park on Nov. 2 where the whole Dominion team was staying in order to attend a training of sorts. In that hotel conference room, there was a tabulator and an adjudication machine the team was told to walk around the room and look at. Carone said a Dominion manager (the man who initially contacted her for the position) talked for around an hour telling the team where they were going to be assigned for the election. “They gave us a binder that they told us to go through, which actually was very beneficial to me and a lot of the attorneys because it gave a lot of information regarding their software and image cast and how, yes, the machines were connected to the Wi-Fi. Absolutely,” she told The Epoch Times. “It even says it in there.” In the bottom right-hand corner of the computers used to tabulate and adjudicate ballots there is a Wi-Fi signal but it doesn’t show if the machines were connected to the worldwide web or if they were just connected to a network, Carone said, unless a mouse hovers over it. She was not allowed access to it, she said. “In the manual that they provided me with it says to make sure that every tabulating machine is connected via Ethernet cable,” Carone added. Carone’s affidavit was submitted as a supplement to a lawsuit in Michigan. The suit was brought in early November by the Great Lakes Justice Center on behalf of Cheryl Costantino and Edward McCall. Plaintiffs allege that because of multiple irregularities, the election in Wayne County should be voided. Carone’s main role was to assist Dominion with IT work: it involved inspecting the tabulating machines or adjudication machines and to help anybody who needed it. She would often open the tabulators to fix any paper jams or other issues with the machine. Patrick Colbeck, a former state senator, aerospace engineer, and a poll challenger at the TCF center in Detroit, said in a sworn affidavit that the machines appeared to have been connected to the internet. Colbeck said the area had wireless routers set up with networks called “CPSStaff” and “AV Counter” broadcast in the area. All it takes to confirm the connectivity status of a Windows computer “is to roll the cursor over the LAN connection icon in the bottom right corner of the display. When there is no internet connection, a unique icon showing a cross-hatched globe appears. I proceeded to review the terminal screens for the Tabulator and Adjudicator computers and I observed the icon that indicates internet connection on each terminal,” according to Colbeck’s affidavit. “All the tabulator computers were connected via Ethernet cables to a network router,” Colbeck told The Epoch Times. “And that router, in turn, was connected to another router that was connected to the adjudicators. Those were connected to another router/firewall which was connected to the internet, which was connected to the local data center.” “Anybody who understands IT knows that if one computer is connected on a network to the internet, all the computers on that network are connected to the internet. And I know that the local data center was connected to the other networks,” he added. Colbeck said he later approached some of the election officials at the center and told them they could dispel his concerns by simply moving their mouse over the icon and that a pop up would appear indicating if the computer was connected to the internet or not. The officials would not move their mouse for him, Colbeck said. They told him to trust their word. Colbeck said a number of different affidavits have been submitted detailing some of the “weird things happening on the network.” He said there were outages and error messages. “The errors that popped up on the computers with the tabulators and adjudicators was something called backup overflow,” he said. “That’s not a standard Windows error message. Where you do see that error message is when you’re trying to backup to a SQL database. Now, either each one of these tabulators had their own SQL database built into that workstation, or they’re trying to connect to some outside database that was not local at that workstation.”


“Many of the features of Dominion that are being characterized as glitches are actually designed features of dominion to help people manipulate the results of the election,” Colbeck asserted.
Voting machines connected to the internet are particularly vulnerable to hackers. According to a 2020 fact sheet published by the Michigan Bureau of Elections: “Voting machines cannot be connected to the internet during ballot tabulation.” But the bureau states that after counting is finished and a paper record is generated, some jurisdictions “connect the machines to the internet to send unofficial results to the county clerk.” On Election day and the day after, Carone said she also witnessed countless workers rescanning batches of mail-in-ballots at the TCF Center without disregarding them first, resulting in the ballots being counted 4 to 5 times in some instances. Workers were handed a batch of around 50 mail-in ballots at a time that they would run through tabulators, which would often get jammed. “I witnessed countless workers rescanning the batches without discarding them first which resulted in ballots being counted 4-5 times,” she said in her affidavit. When she brought up these concerns to a Dominion manager, he told her: “Melissa, I don’t want to hear it. We are here to assist with IT, we are not here to run their election.” Carone said the adjudication process normally involves both a Republican and a Democrat judging the ballots, but during a night shift she overheard two women talking about their political party—they were both Democrats and they decided to sit together. “There was no oversight,” she said. “Nobody asking them any questions. It was just a free-for-all.” Carone said she will soon submit a second sworn affidavit containing information she says will “shine a lot of light on this and how it happened.” She has since contacted the FBI on two occasions, in one instance speaking with a woman for over an hour, but the bureau never called her back or followed up with her after receiving her information. Carone said Dominion machines “absolutely” had the had the capacity to switch votes. In her affidavit, she mentioned Dominion employees talking to each other about a data loss and that they “all got on their phones and stepped to the side of the stage.” “I don’t believe that was actually a data loss,” she said. “That was what my boss told me. I believe that was when Dominion found out Trump was ahead by over 130,000 votes.” Dominion did not immediately respond to an emailed request by The Epoch Times for comment on this article. On their website they categorically deny what they describe as “false assertions about vote switching and software issues” with their systems.
There was an intense atmosphere of intimidation toward Republican poll challengers in the TCF Center, according to Carone. Numerous Republican poll challengers were “pushed aside.” “I was told [by Dominion] not to talk to them, not to answer any questions,” she said. “They were just treating them awfully, very rude.” At one point during the night, steel ballot boxes were placed behind the poll counters. “They were trying to create a barricade between the poll challengers and the counters,” she said. “As the night went on more ballots got put into these boxes and they would start stacking them, creating a higher barricade.” Carone said in her affidavit that she was the only Republican working for Dominion in Detroit. She described the atmosphere in the center as “very tense.” “Dominion employees and the city workers were making comments about people that had any kind of an American flag on their attire, that they were automatically deemed Trump supporters,” she said. “They were just making comments saying how disgusting Trump is.” “I just started acting like I was a Democrat because I didn’t want them to even get suspicious of it,” she added. “I was just nervous, you know?” During her first 24-hour shift, Carone said she did not see a single ballot for Trump. The next day she did witness some. Carone said she does not have any faith in the integrity of Dominion’s software or tabulating process. Dominion has not contacted her about the contents of her affidavit or of her allegations.

Georgia State Farm Arena Footage Shows Poll Workers Staying Behind, Pulling Out Suitcases With Ballots
The Epoch Times

URL: https://www.theepochtimes.com/state-far ... 03293.html
Category: Politics
Published: December 30, 2020

Description: President Donald Trump’s legal team on Thursday presented surveillance footage to a Georgia State Legislature hearing that appears to show election ballot-counting workers kicking out poll observers late at night on Election Day before pulling out suitcases allegedly filled with ballots. A woman who identified herself as Jackie Pick, a lawyer who is assisting with their legal case, said the team received video footage from State Farm Arena’s vote-tabulation center in Fulton County, Georgia. The team said that GOP poll watchers were not allowed to watch the counting process in the poll center. But, according to Pick, an unusual occurrence took place later in the evening at around 10 p.m. ET. A woman—described as a blonde woman with braids—told workers to stop counting and told everyone to go home. “Everyone clears out, including the Republican observers and the press, but four people stay behind and continue counting and tabulating well into the night,” Pick said. They counted unobserved until about 1 a.m. Pick said that video footage shows Fulton County election workers waiting at their scanning areas until GOP poll watchers and reporters left the room before they started “scanning ballots,” ostensibly without any observation. Pick noted that it contravenes state and county law.
WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes


-- Team Trump (@TeamTrump) December 3, 2020

At 11 p.m., once everyone is gone, the workers are seen “pulling ballots out from underneath a table.” She asked if it’s normal to “store suitcases of ballots under a table cloth?” Pick said after reviewing footage that it’s not a normal procedure. It’s not clear if election workers knew they were being recorded on camera. The lawyer further alleged that the same woman with the blonde hair and braids, presumably the manager, had placed the table there earlier. It’s not clear where those ballots came from, and it’s not clear when the suitcases of thousands of ballots were placed under the table. Witnesses have sworn in affidavits that the counting continued until the early morning hours, Trump’s team said. “Why are they counting them when the place is cleared out with no witnesses?” Pick said. She argued that based on the number of ballots there, it is “beyond the margin of victory” in the presidential race. It’s because three scanners—which can carry out several thousand ballot processes per hour—were working several hours that night. This process, she said, “goes on, and on, and on” until the early morning hours.

President Donald Trump said on Twitter that the video is significant evidence showing voter fraud. Trump wrote: “Wow! Blockbuster testimony taking place right now in Georgia. Ballot stuffing by Dems when Republicans were forced to leave the large counting room. Plenty more coming, but this alone leads to an easy win of the State!” In the hearing, it was noted that officials cleared out State Farm Arena on Election Night due to an alleged pipe break. Pick and other members of Trump’s team said it’s not clear whether this was the reason why poll workers and members of the press were kicked out. Fulton County officials haven’t responded to a request for comment.
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Thread by @APhilosophae on Thread Reader App

Postby smix » Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:44 pm

Thread by @APhilosophae on Thread Reader App

URL: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325 ... 63072.html
Category: Science
Published: November 9, 2020



The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.

This is based on their proprietary "Edison" data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.

The CSV is available here:
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=145 ... 3598825215
And the script to generate it is here:
Pastebin.com - Potentially offensive content ahead!
Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.

I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.

What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.

One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots.


As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It's such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers.

How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud? Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!

Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again.


and again


and again


and again all over the country. What appears to be happening is that points on the straight line are actually mail in votes. The reason they're so homogeneous across with respect to the ratio of #Biden vs #Trump votes is that they get randomly shuffled in the mail...


like a deck of cards. Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time...
and across different reporting updates.

Lets dig a little deeper into this:

Here is a plot of the same Florida voting data, but this time it's the ratio of #Biden to #Trump ballots, versus time. What we see is that the initial ballot reportings are very noisy and "random".


The initial reporting represents in-person voting. These vote reports have such large variation bc in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments.
We can see this same pattern of noisy in-person voting, followed by homogeneous mail-in reporting in almost all cases.

What we see in almost all examples across the country is that the ratio of mail-in Dem to Rep ballots is very consistent across time, but with the notable drift from Dem to slightly more Rep.

APhilosophae-7.png (11 KiB) Viewed 15 times

This slight drift from D to R mail-ins occurs again and again, and is likely due to outlying rural areas having more R votes. These outlying areas take longer to ship their ballots to the polling centers.

Now we're getting into the really good stuff. When we see mail-in ballot counting where there isn't relatively stable ratios of D and R ballots that slightly drift R, we have an anomaly! Anomalies themselves are not necessarily fraud, but they can help us spot fraud more easily.

Now let's look at some anomalies:

This is the Wisconsin vote counting history log. Again, on the Y axis we have the ratio of D to R ballots in reporting batch, and on the X axis we have reporting time.


Around 4am there, there is a marked shift in the ratio of D to R mail-in ballots. Based on other posts in this thread, this should not happen. This is an anomaly, and while anomalies are not always fraud, often they may point to fraud.

so what happened just before 3am CST in Wisconsin? This did!

https://twitter.com/mattsmith_news/stat ... 5638809601

Around 3am Wisconsin time, a fresh batch of 169k new absentee ballots arrived. They were supposed to stop accepting new ballots, but eh, whatever I guess.

By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out of whack. That is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots. They inherently have a different D to R signature...

than the rest of the ballots quite possibly bc additional ballots were added to the batch, either through backdating or ballot manufacturing or software tampering. This of this being kind of analogous to carbon-14 dating, but for ballot batch authenticity.

lets look at another anomaly:


Here is Pennsylvania's vote counting history. For the first part of the vote counting process, we see the same pattern for mail-in ballots that we've seen in every other state in the country, which is relatively stable D to R ratio that gradually drifts R as more ballots...

come in from rural outlying areas.

But then as counting continues, the D to R ratio in mail-in ballots inexplicably begin "increasing". Again, this should not happen, and it is observed almost nowhere else in the country, because all of the ballots are randomly shuffled...

in the mail system and should be homogeneous during counting. The only exceptions to this are other suspect states that also have anomalies.
Again, this is evidence of ballot backdating, manufacturing of software tampering.

Lets look at another anomaly:


In Georgia we see pretty much the same story as Pennsylvania: increasing fractions of mail-in D ballots over time even though it defies logic and we see this pattern no where else in the country.
In Michigan, we see a combination of Wisconsin strangeness, together with the GA/PA weirdness. We see both signs of contaminated ballot dumping, and ballot ratios drifting toward dems when they should not be.



APhilosophae-12.png (11.15 KiB) Viewed 15 times

Now in fairness, VA is the only state out of the 50 that has anomalies but has not had accusations of voter fraud, yet. I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Yet to figure out what causes this anomalous shift, but here it is so no one accuses me of holding it back.

Lets wrap this up: It appears Dems shot themselves in the foot bc making everyone do mail-in ballots actually makes it easier to catch mail-in ballot fraud. Bc all of the ballots go through the postal system, they get shuffled like a deck of cards, so we expect reported...

ballot return to be extremely UNIFORM in terms of D vs R ratio, but to drift slightly towards R over time bc some of those ballots travel farther. This pattern proves fraud and is a verifiable timestamp of when each fraudulent action occurred.

Please disseminate as necessary. Good luck. Stay safe. Be kind to your neighbors.

User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

American Coup

Postby smix » Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:16 am

American Coup
Frontpage Magazine

URL: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/1 ... reenfield/
Category: Politics
Published: November 9, 2020

Description: This was not just voter fraud out of Philly. It’s a coup by the oligarchy.
The plan was simple. Saturate the media with polls showing a blue wave and an inevitable victory. Discourage people from voting in person. And then, after tabulating the paltry votes of those who defied the media to vote in person, dump all the tampered, altered, and harvested ballots for Biden in key cities. Even before Election Day, the Democrats knew their plan was going awry. Suddenly, instead of urging their base to use mail-in ballots they were, just as loudly, telling them to vote in person. Why? Too few Republicans were voting by mail and too many were going to vote in person. If the Election Day numbers tilted too decisively to President Trump before suddenly going Biden’s way, the election would look rigged, and there would be an outcry from Republicans. Despite last minute efforts urging Democrats to vote in person, that’s exactly what happened. Once again, Democrats had overreached, committed a massive crime, and have been left with no choice except to ride the tiger. That’s what happened last time when the Obama administration allied with the Clinton campaign to eavesdrop on its political opponents. And then doubled down with investigations and indictments, not of the perpetrators, but the victims. Despite the blatant irregularities in key battleground states, they’re doubling down again. The American Coup is underway. In classic Leninist fashion, its initial goal is to control the propaganda and the process. The media has declared Biden to be the winner while mass celebratory gatherings cheer the new order. Big Tech censors any skepticism about the election. And the same faction that declared four years ago that casting doubt on an election was patriotic and the best defense of democracy now claims exactly it’s treason. The only Democrat rule is that it’s patriotic when they do it and treason when their opponents do. That’s not how ‘democrats think. It’s how dictators rule. All of this is a sideshow. What really matters is the process, not the propaganda. The propaganda is meant to divert attention from how implausible the media’s numbers are. Republican turnout rose, instead of falling, in in-person voting, and the GOP also went into Election Day with clear leads in mail-in ballots in key battleground states, including Wisconsin and Michigan. The tide of Biden ballots that arrived during the night resulted in implausible turnout figures. The photos, videos, and whistleblower accounts of poll and postal workers tampering with ballots didn’t take long to show up. And just as quickly to be censored. The odd numbers mostly came out of urban areas run by notoriously corrupt political machines. And the race between those trying to steal and unsteal the election began with a power struggle. In Philly and Detroit, efforts were made to keep Republican observers out of view. In Philly, it took a court order to even get the observers within sight of the ballots, while the city continued to fight the ruling. In Detroit, windows were covered up with cardboard, and Republican observers were locked out. Potentially tens of thousands of ballots were illegally transposed with no Republican observers. In Pennsylvania, Democrat operatives had been illegally given access to rejected mail-in ballots so that they could arrange for provisionals. And back in Detroit, workers were told to backdate ballots that had arrived after the election. In Wisconsin, thousands of witness statements may have been illegally altered. Meanwhile the glitches, errors, and irregularities began piling up. In Antrim County, Michigan, a "glitch" turned over a county that President Trump had won to Joe Biden. The glitch was only noticed because the results didn't match past trends. More than half of the state’s counties use the same software. “Just last night in Oakland County, we found 2,000 ballots that had been given to Democrats, that were Republican ballots, due to a clerical error," RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel announced at a press conference. Oakland had been one of three counties that were crucial to the state being called for Biden. And then there were the voting dead who went on voting and being registered after death. That allegedly included a woman who voted a week after she died. The voting dead are not a new problem in Philly. If the dead didn’t vote, few elections would go on as usual. And yet the same media that spent four years falsely claiming that Russians had somehow rigged the previous election with a few thousand dollars in Facebook ads, have declared that accusing the incorruptible City of Brotherly Love of corruption is an outrage. It’s no coincidence that the areas at the center of the vote fraud controversy, Philly, Detroit, and Atlanta, are also some of the most corrupt cities in the country with plenty of jailed officials. All of them Democrats. It wasn’t that long ago that four election officials were charged with fraud in Philly for adding votes to a machine. Three years earlier, Philly came to the nation’s attention when it was noticed that 59 city precincts hadn't registered a single vote for Mitt Romney. Just three years ago, an elderly couple testified that they were prevented from voting in Philly because they were Republicans. "When an Election Board worker heard they wanted to vote Republican, a witness heard him bellow: "Not on my machine!" The Philadelphia Inquirer reported. This year, Michael “Ozzie” Myers, a former Philly Congressman, was charged by the Department of Justice with "fraudulently stuffing the ballot boxes for specific candidates in the 2014, 2015, and 2016 primary elections, bribery of an election official, falsification of records, voting more than once in federal elections, and obstruction of justice." In 1994, the fraud in one Philly election was so bad that a federal judge ruled that a Democrat State Senator had to be replaced by a Republican shifting control of the Pennsylvania Senate. The New York Times, at the time noted that, "Democratic campaign workers forged absentee ballots. On many of the ballots, they used the names of people who were living in Puerto Rico or serving time in prison, and in one case, the voter had been dead for some time." In, what ought to be a familiar story, "the two Democrats on the three-member board of elections, an elected body, testified that they were aware of the voter fraud, had intentionally failed to enforce the election law and had later tried to conceal their activities by hurriedly certifying the Democratic candidate as the winner." The question isn’t whether there’s fraud in Philly elections. The only question is how much. When Democrats and their media operatives deny the obvious, anyone from Philly, from Detroit, and from cities run by their corrupt political machines can only laugh into his mandatory mask. The only way this was a fair election is if there was no voter fraud in Philly. And does anyone really believe that? The plot against America can’t stop. Not when it’s gone this far. Vote fraud isn’t new in American elections. Not even in presidential elections. But it’s never been backed by this degree of coordination and propaganda by the media and Big Tech. When Daley stole the election from Nixon for JFK in Chicago, the operation wasn’t coordinated with the media and Big Tech. That’s the difference between political corruption and an oligarchy. When a political party steals an election, it’s corruption, but when a coalition of tech monopolies, media corporations, and their handpicked party steal an election, it’s a coup. This was not an election. It was a coup. This was not just voter fraud out of Philly. It’s a coup by the San Francisco oligarchy. The weeping cable news anchors, and the ruthless suppression of dissent by Facebook, Twitter, and Google, are how fake elections are conducted in totalitarian dictatorships. It’s un-American. This was not just a coup against President Trump and the 70 million who voted for him. It’s a coup against America.

Why Trump Will Win
Frontpage Magazine

URL: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/1 ... hippolito/
Category: Politics
Published: November 25, 2020

Description: “Absolutely frightening” evidence of entrenched fraud.
During his campaign rallies, President Donald Trump proclaimed, "We got 'em all" or "We have it all!" In the coming weeks -- if not days -- Americans will find out specifically what he means. Those specifics promise to shake Americans to their core by revealing years of entrenched political corruption reflected in electoral fraud. Lawyer Sidney Powell is providing a preview. Powell, who apparently had been helping Trump's legal team prepare a case against alleged election fraud, told Howie Carr, a conservative radio host in Boston, on Friday: "We've got a number of smoking guns -- and we may have to get witness protection for some of them. We have a lot of extremely solid evidence. It's beyond impressive and absolutely terrifying." Among those smoking guns:
-- Hillary Clinton used fraud to steal California's Democratic Presidential primary four years ago from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. "When people told him about it," Powell said, "instead of exposing it, he sold out."
-- An employee of the Defense Department, in a conference call that included Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, told government officials how to commit sabotage in their respective offices. "There were a couple of hundred people on that call," Powell said.
-- China, Iran, Serbia and Liechtenstein played key roles in interfering with the Presidential election.
On Saturday night in an interview with Newsmax, Powell mentioned:
-- Each Democratic candidate in Pennsylvania received 35,000 extra votes. "I would be willing to bet it happened everywhere," Powell said.
-- States recalibrated voting machines after deadlines for modification passed.
-- Machines awarded a value of 1.25 for each vote former Vice President Joe Biden received but calculated every Trump vote at only .75. "You can see the reports of fractional numbers for the votes." Powell said.
-- A former Venezuelan military officer who helped develop the machines testified they could be manipulated. "He knew as soon as the machines were turned off in those key states," Powell said, that massive support for Trump "had broken the algorithm that had been programmed. So they had to stop counting and backfill the vote with fraudulent mail-in ballots or whatever means they used."
This same officer, Powell told Fox's Lou Dobbs on Nov. 16, "was personally in briefings when all of this was discussed and planned, beginning with Hugo Chavez, how it was designed there and then saw it happening in this country." (Emphasis added) Powell -- who filed a lawsuit challenging Georgia's tabulation Wednesday -- continues to receive severe criticism and ridicule, even accusations of lying. But Powell is subject to the same laws against libel and slander as any other American. If her assertions against Clinton, Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, for starters, were found to show malicious disregard for the truth, an ensuing conviction would destroy her reputation and career. "Sidney Powell is a serious lawyer. She is not going to make a false claim. Period," said Larry Johnson, a counter-terrorism specialist who spent four years in the State Department and 22 years devising anti-terrorism exercises for military special operations. Meanwhile, Rudy Giuliani, one if Trump's main attorneys, issued this statement Sunday: "Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump Legal Team. She is also not a lawyer for the President in his personal capacity.” Powell corroborated that release with her own: "I agree with the campaign's statement that I am not part of the campaign's legal team. I never signed a retainer agreement or sent the President or the campaign a bill for my expenses or fees. “My intent has always been to expose all the fraud I could find and let the chips fall where they may -- whether it be upon Republicans or Democrats." Trump's team is filing civil cases. Powell approaches the allegations of electoral fraud as a criminal matter. "We're pursuing two different theories," Giuliani told Dobbs on Monday night. Trump's team is concentrating on "misconduct of the election by state officials in at least five or six different states" involving "the deprivation of Constitutional rights for the President," Giuliani said. So how does Powell know what she knows? As she told Dobbs, "I'm going to release the Kraken." In this case, "Kraken" is not a mythical sea monster but a program the CIA and Defense Department use to get information about the nation's enemies by hacking computers and cellphones. The program includes various forms of malware, such as viruses, Trojan horses and remote-control systems -- and even was used against ostensible allies. In 2017, WikiLeaks released numerous CIA documents detailing "Kraken." They included orders to spy on all major candidates in France's 2012 presidential election, including the incumbent at the time, Nicholas Sarkozy. "Kraken" would provide information on each party's election strategy and each candidate's private conferences and ability to influence political decisions. The CIA uses another program in conjunction with "Kraken," called "Hammer" (or "Hamr" in the files WikiLeaks released), which Powell referenced. "Hamr" spies on protected networks without being detected. Numerous plugins accompany "Hamr" to enhance its effectiveness. One, "AngerManagement," targets Android devices. Another, "WildTurkey," tests and refines its capabilities. If WikiLeaks made CIA documents available to the public, Powell surely could access them and use specialists to translate the code and jargon. After Powell spoke with Dobbs, reports began circulating about an American military operation conducted to take servers in Germany. At first, many thought the servers belonged to two election technology firms, Dominion and Scytl. Dominion -- founded by Venezuelans -- manufactured the questionable voting machines used in this month's election. But those servers apparently belong to the CIA, which has a field office in Frankfurt. The State Department also operates a consulate in that city. "The U.S. military has full authority to do this because any CIA activity in the European theater is being conducted using military cover," Johnson said. "In other words, CIA officers would be identified to the German government (and anyone else asking) as military employees or consultants. "Such an operation would have been carried out with U.S. law enforcement present to take custody of the evidence. That means that the evidence will be under the control of the Department of Justice through U.S. Attorneys and can be used in court or other judicial proceedings." Neither CIA Director Gina Haspel nor FBI Director Christopher Wray knew about the operation, Johnson added. Since Dominion owns servers in Germany and Scytl operates them in Spain -- servers that received raw election data -- "Kraken" could be used to manipulate that data. If Powell does not represent Trump directly, she works in tandem with his legal team. If so, Trump would have the authority to declassify any information Powell could use. Such a scenario would explain these comments Powell made to Carr: "You have to realize how many forces -- including many in the government -- have benefited from this system. They knew it worked the way it worked, and they used it to install the people they wanted to install in particular offices. "I think the fraud in the election goes much farther than the president. I think they did it to any particularly strong Republican candidate this time around." In other words, the United States faces its biggest political and existential crisis since the Civil War -- if not in its history.
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

On Electoral Fraud in 2020

Postby smix » Wed Nov 11, 2020 5:01 am

On Electoral Fraud in 2020
American Greatness

URL: https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/09/on-e ... d-in-2020/
Category: Politics
Published: November 9, 2020

Description: If there was a plot to unseat President Trump through illicit means, it would be in the interest of citizens to bring to light whether or not they still can choose their representatives.
Something strange is going on in the neighborhoods of Pennsylvania. The dead appear to have arisen from the grave to enlist in the Democratic cause. A lawsuit filed in the Keystone State before Election Day by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) claims there were 21,000 deceased people on its voter rolls ahead of the 2020 election, the Washington Times reports. PILF argued that Pennsylvania broke the law by failing to maintain voter rolls. Ninety percent of the more than 21,000 registered voters have been dead for more than five years. Of that number, 12,192 were listed as active. Odd as that sounds, Pennsylvania’s dead voters are actually dwarfed in number by “ghost” voters nationwide. These are not the dearly departed, reanimated sort who have graciously decided to enlist in the Democratic cause. Rather, “ghost” voters are those who never were. They were never born. They don’t exist. A study of Census Bureau population statistics and state voter registration data by Judicial Watch illuminates this issue. The study, reported in the Washington Times, found that 352 U.S. counties in 29 states generated 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens. “In other words, the registration rates of those counties exceeded 100 percent of eligible voters. The study found eight states showing state-wide registration rates exceeding 100 percent: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Oddities in the Battleground States
Various and sundry irregularities were, it seems, the norm this election. In Wisconsin, according to Milwaukee radio reporter Dan O’Donnell, county and municipal clerks and poll workers may have unlawfully altered witness statements on thousands of mail-in ballots across the state. O’Donnell notes that Wisconsin Statute 6.86 provides that an absentee ballot must be signed by a witness, who is also required to list his or her address. “If a witness address is not listed, then the ballot is considered invalid and must be returned to the voter to have the witness correct,” O’Donnell notes. Instead, municipal clerks and vote counters statewide were instructed by the Wisconsin Elections Commission simply to fill in the witness address themselves so that the ballot would not be invalidated. “Anticipating a legal challenge to this seemingly highly unlawful advice, the WEC instructed clerks to write in these witness addresses in red pen so that they would be easy to find during a recount or audit of the vote,” O’Donnell writes. Thus, thousands of ballots may have been inadvertently invalidated in a state Biden won by a margin of less than one percent. In Nevada, an election worker’s affidavit claims voters were allowed to cast provisional ballots without a valid Nevada ID or driver’s license provided they could offer proof of an upcoming appointment at the DMV. There are many other examples like those outlined here across the country and they all seem to favor Biden, or at least do not help Trump. Glendale, Arizona, a city in Maricopa County, saw ballots swiped from mailboxes. The Arizona attorney general’s office reported that a worker at a farm located a stack of unopened mail-in ballots three days after the election and contacted Glendale police. In Michigan, the state GOP referred a whistleblower complaint to the Justice Department. A Detroit city employee claimed she was instructed to improperly change the dates on ballots, the Washington Examiner reported. According to Laura Cox, the chairwoman of the state’s Republican Party, “the employees directing the whistleblower were working out of Detroit’s TCF Center, which is the main hub where absentee ballots in Wayne County were being counted.” Something similar reportedly occurred in Pennsylvania. “Postmaster Rob Weisenbach directed my co-workers and I (sic) to pick up ballots after Election Day and provide them to him,” Richard Hopkins said in an affidavit obtained and released by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Hopkins is a mailman in Erie. He claims Weisenbach ordered staff to collect and submit late ballots, which Hopkins “said supervisors then backdated so that they appeared to have been mailed in time,” the Washington Times reported. “As discussed more fully below, I heard Weisenbach tell a supervisor at my office that Weisenbach was back-dating the postmarks on the ballots to make it appear as though the ballots had been collected on November 3, 2020 despite them in fact being collected on November 4 and possibly later.”
Above the Law?
The most peculiar election irregularities involved Dominion Voting Systems, a company that sells electronic voting hardware and software. Dominion’s products served 71 million voters in 1,600 jurisdictions in 2016. Georgia election officials in 2019 selected Dominion to provide a new statewide voting system for 2020, against the protests of election integrity activists. A federal judge “expressed serious concerns” about Georgia’s new election system, the Associated Press reported at the time, “but declined to order the state to abandon its touchscreen voting machines in favor of hand-marked paper ballots for the November election.” The judge’s ruling came as a blow to voting integrity activists who filed a lawsuit against the election system Georgia acquired from Dominion for a handsome sum upwards of $100 million. Vendors like Dominion generally get their way in the courts and hate scrutiny. “Voting machine companies have been actively seeking to avoid this type of scrutiny,” Jordan Wilkie wrote in The Guardian. “They have sent threats of litigation to academics researching their machines.” Wilkie notes that these companies “have also blocked litigation seeking records from the machines when there were errors in vote counts and have lied to journalists and to elected officials about the fact that some machines could be accessed remotely.” One academic paper by Princeton, Georgia Tech, and U.C. Berkeley professors on the vulnerability of electronic voting systems points out Dominion’s ImageCast Evolution (ICE) product, an optical scan tabulator with a ballot-marking device that allows the voter to deposit a handmarked paper ballot.
Vote-stealing software could easily be constructed that looks for undervotes on the ballot, and marks those unvoted spaces for the candidate of the hacker’s choice. This is very straightforward to do on optical-scan bubble ballots (as on the Dominion ICE) where undervotes are indicated by no mark at all. On machines such as the ExpressVote and ExpressVoteXL, the normal software indicates an undervote with the words NO SELECTION MADE on the ballot summary card. Hacked software could simply leave a blank space there (most voters wouldn’t notice the difference), and then fill in that space and add a matching bar code after the voter has clicked “cast this ballot.” An even worse feature of the ES&S ExpressVote and the Dominion ICE is the auto-cast configuration setting (in the manufacturer’s standard software) that allows the voter to indicate, “don’t eject the ballot for my review, just print it and cast it without me looking at it.” If fraudulent software were installed in the ExpressVote, it could change all the votes of any voter who selected this option, because the voting machine software would know in advance of printing that the voter had waived the opportunity to inspect the printed ballot. We call this auto-cast feature “permission to cheat.”

Dominion does not like to see this in print. Wilkie recalls a speech delivered by Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) at an election security conference in Washington, D.C. Wyden said the voting machine lobby of which Dominion is a part “literally thinks they are just above the law, they are accountable to nobody, [and] they have been able to hotwire the political system in certain parts of the country like we’ve seen in Georgia.”

Glitches, “User Errors,” and Other Alarms
As it turns out, Georgia was one place where Dominion machines acted oddly. The night before the presidential election in Georgia, a software update was uploaded to Dominion’s machines. The update, whatever it was, caused a glitch in Morgan and Spalding counties that temporarily prevented voters from casting machine ballots. The company “uploaded something last night, which is not normal, and it caused a glitch,” Marcia Ridley, elections supervisor at Spalding County board of election, told Politico. “That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election,” Ridley said, yet unaware of what had been uploaded. Something similar happened in Gwinnett County around the same time, affecting at least 80,000 mailed absentee ballots. The ballots are counted in batches. According to county spokesman Joe Sorenson, 3,200 batches had at least one unreadable ballot at the time. They would be uploaded but likely skipped and not counted in the process. “The elections board still intends to go back through the batches and check the ballots that can’t be read to see if a voter’s intentions are clear, a process called adjudication,” the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported. “But Sorenson said the decision was made to upload results now with the knowledge that the vote totals would change as they’re looked at more closely.” Sorenson said this was the first time of the three elections since new voting machines were in use that the problem had occurred. President Trump held a 1.1 percentage-point lead in Georgia over Joe Biden the night of the election. Biden is now nearly 10,200 votes ahead. “Few ballots remain to be counted, though exactly how many is unclear,” the Journal-Constitution reported, a week after the election. Along with controlling roughly one-third of the voting machine market, Dominion has contracts in all of the key swing states where Trump’s campaign team is mounting legal challenges, plus Nevada and Arizona. Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell recently raised alarms over Dominion’s ties to the Democratic Party. Powell pointed out that Nadeam Elshami, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) former chief of staff, became a lobbyist for Dominion last year. Richard Blum, Senator Dianne Feinstein’s (D-Calif.) husband, is also a significant shareholder in the company. During an interview, Powell said no fewer than 450,000 ballots have been identified in key states with only a mark for Biden and no other down-ballot candidate. Like Georgia, Michigan also had a particularly bizarre incident involving the voting systems provider. “In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates,” state party chairwoman Cox told reporters. “The county clerk came forward and said, ‘tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the votes,’” Cox said. With roughly 98 percent of the vote tallied, the Washington Times reported, Biden led Trump in Michigan by 2.6 percent, or 147,897 votes. “Antrim County, a GOP area, was believed to have flipped in support of the former vice president, but after the error was caught, it remained red,” according to the Washington Times. Jocelyn Benson, a spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state, claimed the 6,000 vote swing was a user error, not a problem with Dominion products. But Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel shot back with a call for a statewide investigation. Michigan Republicans argued the election results in Detroit may have been skewed as a result because absentee ballots were tabulated improperly.
Transparency Trumps Conspiracy Theory
For all these irregularities and more, some 71 million Americans are crying foul and demanding transparency. They want answers. For that, they are mocked as “conspiracy theorists.” But the problem might be in our understanding of what constitutes a “conspiracy.” We are conditioned to view them as baseless allegations, the fever dreams of the deluded and disaffected, rather than as plans formulated in secret—something utterly commonplace. Machiavelli, the “founder” of modern political science, devotes the longest section of his Discourses on Livy to conspiracies. If one had to guess the reason conspiracies receive the longest treatment in a treatise about republican government, it is that they are all too common in them. Yet all too commonly they are misunderstood, and ruinous both for the rulers and the ruled. If there was a plot to unseat President Trump through illicit means, it would be in the interest of citizens to bring to light whether or not they still can choose their representatives. If not, then no one should be surprised that our differences become irreconcilable, that Americans lose faith in the ballot box and, in time, resort to blows.

RNC Monitor Catches Election Worker in Georgia Switching Trump Votes to Biden
American Greatness

URL: https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/16/rnc- ... -to-biden/
Category: Politics
Published: November 16, 2020

Description: An RNC monitor who was observing the ballot recount in Georgia said an auditor was caught changing votes from Trump to Biden three times in three minutes. “Now, that’s just while I’m standing there. So does the second checker catch it every time?” Hale Soucie, the monitor asked a Project Veritas undercover reporter. Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe sent a team of undercover journalists to the Georgia recount to record any suspicious activity. It wasn’t long before one of his “insiders” came across some “irregularities.” “This lady, three times in three minutes—from 2:09 to 2:12—she got three wrong,” Soucie told the Veritas reporter. “Does it get corrected the next time?” he fretted. As usual, the “mistakes” all went one way. Soucie said he had to leave that table to observe election workers at the next who were also behaving suspiciously. He said a counter was handing an auditor a ballot, and then the auditor accepted the vote for Biden without even bothering to check it. “She’s not even looking at it, she’s putting it in,” Soucie said. “That person is supposed to be auditing it,” he explained. Soucie said he reported the problem to the Cobb County election officials who told him they’d talk to the auditors. After that, the auditor “got all cutesy,” Soucie noted, sarcastically putting the ballot up close to her face to examine the ballots when she knew he was watching. He said when he started walking away, he saw her glaring at him. “That’s when things started getting real shady—like really tense and crap,” Soucie told the Veritas reporter. He said that no matter where he was standing in the room, she and a couple of others would call their bosses and point at him. “I haven’t touched anybody, haven’t talk to anybody,” the RNC monitor said defensively. “all I’m doing is writing down and observing and telling what happened.” Soucie said that he observed several other election workers talking with the auditor and pointing at him. Then, while he was taking a stroll around the room, he said he heard the hostile auditor railing against him. “I’m paid by the taxpayer and this f—king asshole is coming out and watching me,” she allegedly complained. Soucie later explained why the situation concerned him. If votes aren’t being counted correctly and the auditors aren’t bothering to check those ballots, then “stuff could be sliding through,” he said.
BREAKING: Georgia Recount Auditors Call Multiple Ballots For @JoeBiden That Were Actually Marked For @realDonaldTrump “The second person was supposed to be checking it right, three times in three minutes she called out Biden.”#RiggedRecounts
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) November 16, 2020

Republicans have been very unhappy with how Georgia election officials are handling the recount. Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Patriots, complained on Friday that the state was not allowing enough monitors to observe the process, and slammed it as “a fake recount.” “Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is doing a tremendous disservice to the people of Georgia by conducting what can only be described as a ‘fraudit’ which fails to provide a complete examination of the election system, the voter rolls, and the eligibility of those who voted,” Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning said in a statement. Last week, Rep. Doug Collins (R-Georgia), who’s leading Team Trump’s election integrity efforts in the state, and Georgia GOP Chairman David Shafer sent an itemized list their concerns in a letter to Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger.
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

MIT Scientists: Data Analysis Of Election Fraud In MI Shows 69,000 Votes Were TRANSFERRED From Trump To Biden!

Postby smix » Thu Nov 12, 2020 3:53 am

MIT Scientists: Data Analysis Of Election Fraud In MI Shows 69,000 Votes Were TRANSFERRED From Trump To Biden!
Libertarian News

URL: https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11 ... -to-biden/
Category: Politics
Published: November 10, 2020

Description: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, who is a MIT trained data scientist and Fulbright Scholar, along with Bennie Smith a Democrat, who is a software engineer, data analyst and an election commissioner and Phil Evans, who is also a trained engineer and data analyst, discuss some very troubling findings after reviewing the election data coming out of Michigan. Dr. Ayyadurai is a US Senate candidate in Massachusetts, which is a contributing factor as to why he began looking into the integrity of our voting systems.

Dr. Ayyadurai’s discovered through a series of FOIA requests related to his own election that ballot counting machines don’t directly count ballots. Instead, they take an image of the ballot that is submitted to them, and then they tabulate the votes based on the ballot images collected. Federal election statues dictate that all election records must be held for 22 months. However, Dr. Ayyadurai discovered that many states do not retain the ballot images produced by the machines. The default settings of the machines automatically store the ballot images, so this means election officials are manually disabling the image storage feature. Because ballot images are not being retained in states like MA and MI, the election results cannot be meaningfully audited, leaving ambiguity as to the actual election outcome. The only way to audit the results of an election without ballot images would be to manually count the ballots, which is very difficult to do. Dr. Ayyadurai learned that in 2001, a weighted race feature was added to Global Election Systems (GEMS 1.18.1) voting systems. This feature allows elections to be skewed to one candidate or another based on the settings of the software. This is not a hack, but a built-in FEATURE of the software. Why this feature exists in US ballot tabulation machines has never been explained. Not only does the software allow for the weighting of election outcomes, but the way votes are stored and counted is also problematic. The systems store the votes as fractional decimals instead of whole numbers. This means the machines can be set to tabulate half a vote, which makes no sense at all, yet that’s how they were designed. After voting “glitches” were reported in Michigan, Dr. Ayyadurai’s team decided to analyze the top four counties in MI for irregularities. They looked at data from Oakland, Macomb, Kent and Wayne counties. What they found was absolutely shocking. Data analytics show, at a minimum, 69,000 votes were TRANSFERRED from Trump to Biden in these four counties, in a pattern that is consistent with algorithmic weighting of a race. In Michigan, there are two different kinds of ballots a person can chose to vote on. A person can chose to vote a straight party ticket or they can chose to vote for each individual candidate separately. They cannot do both. This means straight party ballots and individual selection ballots are tabulated in separate piles which produces two sets of data. The fact that party ballots and individual ballots are separate in MI allowed the data scientists to compare the differences between how often people in a given precinct voted for Trump vs how often people voted for a straight Republican ticket. For example, in this image, the bottom X axis percentage indicates how often people in a given precinct voted a straight Republican ticket. The Y axis indicates how often people voted specifically for Trump on an individual ballot minus the percentage who voted a straight Republican ticket.


So if a given precinct had 50% of people vote a straight Republican ticket and 50% of them vote for Trump on an individual ballot, we would see a dot at 50% on X axis and at 0% Y axis. Intuitively, we would expect most dots to fall along the 0% Y axis line. In other words, if a given precinct tends to vote 60% straight Republican tickets, we would most likely expect to see about 60% of people in that precinct who vote on the individual ballots to chose Trump as well. Instead, what the data shows is a clear linear relationship that starts at about the 20% X axis mark, where the more Republican a precinct is, based on straight party tickets, the less likely people who vote on individual ballots in that precinct are to vote for Trump. Not only is this relationship inverted from what we would expect to see, the manner in which it displays itself is what really gives the fraud away. Notice the linearity of the slope. This linearity can only be the product of an algorithm. The perfection of the slope and distribution is what gives the game away. This same slope is observed in three of the counties that were analysed. It shows up in early voting data as well as election day data. The pattern is consistent spatially as well as temporally. There is absolutely no way this is the product of anything other than an algorithm. Consider what this data is telling us. This data is telling us that the more likely a precinct is to be Republican, the more likely it is the Republicans in that district voted for Biden over Trump, and they did so at a mathematically perfect rate. This is an impossibility. People are sent to jail in fraud cases with far less evidence than this. If this was a legitimate election, we would expect to see a scatter distribution along the 0% Y axis where the red arrow is, with perhaps either a positive or negative bias along axis depending on how much people liked or hated Trump. Here’s what Wayne county’s results look like where no algorithm was detected. Wayne county is strongly Democratic, so its likely they didn’t bother rigging the votes here. There could still be cheating going on here, but this what we would expect all the graphs to look like. We can see voters here liked Trump a lot more than the Republican party.


When Dr. Ayyadurai began complaining on Twitter about the lack of transparency and the fact that ballot images were being deleted, he was attacked by an organization called The National Association of State Election Directors. This organization is funded by corporate interests with ties to the Rockefellers and other international business conglomerates. The NASED actually contacted Twitter and tried to get him banned. Keep in mind he’s a Senate candidate. This organization has been working with the election software companies involved in this fraud. This software is in use far beyond the four counties that were analysed by Dr. Ayyadurai’s team. It explains how Joe Biden, a man who couldn’t get more than a handful of people to turn up at one of his “rallies” managed to get more votes than Donald Trump, a man who routinely held rallies that drew over 50,000 screaming fans who were collectively chanting “WE LOVE YOU!” Biden did not win this election, and now there is ZERO doubt about that fact.

Crazy MI Election Fraud Lawsuit: Tens Of Thousands Of Unsecured Ballots All Going To Biden
Libertarian News

URL: https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11 ... -to-biden/
Category: Politics
Published: November 9, 2020

Description: The claims in this lawsuit by the Great Lakes Justice Center are completely insane. This is a 78 page suit alleging every kind of election fraud you can think of.


Check this one out:


You can see the lawsuit for yourself here
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

IT Contractor for Dominion Ballot Counting Software Co. Exposes Massive Ballot Fraud in Detroit Michigan…

Postby smix » Thu Nov 12, 2020 9:43 pm

IT Contractor for Dominion Ballot Counting Software Co. Exposes Massive Ballot Fraud in Detroit Michigan…
The Conservative Treehouse

URL: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... -michigan/
Category: Politics
Published: November 12, 2020

Description: If what Ms. Mellissa Carone outlines is true, this would explain how the ballots in Michigan were manipulated. Ms. Carone was a contracted worker for Dominion a company providing software services for ballot counting machines in Detroit. Carone was sent to Detroit, Michigan, to provide technical support for the ballot counting process. While she was there she noted poll workers repeatedly double scanning ballots to generate multiple votes from the same batch of ballot sheets. When she reported this to her employer, Mr. Nick Ikonomakis of Dominion, Carone was told it was not her role to review what the poll workers are doing; essentially to ignore it. Ms. Carone also witnessed election workers filling out ballots, fraudulently signing ballots, as well as the unloading of vans in an area of the Detroit election tabulation facility she was not permitted to inspect. Ms Carone was on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs to explain part of what she witnessed.

Ms. Carone gave a longer interview –see here– which has more information. It is always challenging to interpret the validity of whistleblowers; however, Mellissa Carone has some specific details that provide credibility
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

BREAKING: Federal Election Commission Chair Calls Election ‘Illegitimate’ Due To Voter Fraud

Postby smix » Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:50 am

BREAKING: Federal Election Commission Chair Calls Election ‘Illegitimate’ Due To Voter Fraud
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/breaking-feder ... ter-fraud/
Category: Politics
Published: November 12, 2020

Description: "The law is not being followed, making this an illegitimate election."
Trey Trainor, the Chairman of the Federal Election, stated during an appearance on Newsmax this Thursday that he “does believe there’s voter fraud taking place,” and confirmed that the refusal to allow poll watchers to observe the ballot counting process – among numerous other irregularities – does indeed constitute an “illegitimate election.” “I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places,” Trainor said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.” “When you have claims of 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Nevada, when you have the video showing where people are either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there, or they’re in the process of just marking a ballot that came in blank for a voter, that’s a process that needs to be observed by election observers,” Trainor said. The FEC Chairman added that poll observers are legally allowed to be present during the counting of ballots, and if they are refused entry to a place where the vote is being tabulated then “the law is not being followed, making this an illegitimate election.”
BREAKING: Chairman of the Federal Election Commission says he believes “there’s voter fraud taking place” and calls this election “illegitimate”


— The President-Elect Chads (@thehangingchads) November 12, 2020

Trainor went on to forecast that some of the Trump campaign’s legal challenges to the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election will likely end up in the Supreme Court. National File reported this week that U.S. House Rep. Lance Gooden has filed a lawsuit related to refusals to allow GOP poll watchers to observe ballot counting in Texas:
On Monday, U.S. Rep. Lance Gooden announced a lawsuit filed against the Dallas County Elections Office, alleging that the office refused to comply with local law and allow Republican Party poll watchers to observe the vote counting process. “Repeat violations of ballot counting procedures,” which include preventing Republicans from being present during the mail-in ballot tallying process, led to a lawsuit against the Dallas County Elections Office. “Voters deserve to see how their ballots are counted,” Gooden said in a statement provided to the press. “Democrat-run governments on every level will do anything to tip the scales in their favor. We’re not going to let them get away with it.”

In Detroit, poll observers boarded up windows and screamed at poll observers to leave while the latter chanted “Let us in” while locked outside of the vote counting area.

WATCH: Former MI State Senator Says Detroit Tabulation Machines Were Illegally Connected to the Web
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/watch-former-m ... o-the-web/
Category: Politics
Published: November 13, 2020

Description: Yet another person has emerged telling of voting irregularities in Detroit, this time its vote tabulation machines accessible through the internet
With lawsuits pending charging multiple instances of voter fraud in the State of Michigan, now an eyewitness has come forward saying the vote tabulation machines in Detroit’s absentee-vote counting center were connected to the internet. Patrick Colbeck, a poll challenger and former Michigan state senator, has sworn out an affidavit stating that he witnessed the computers used to tabulate absentee ballot votes at the TCF Center in Detroit connected to the internet and transmitting and receiving data on Election Night. Colbeck stated in his affidavit that at approximately 11pm on November 3, he observed the Windows PC icon identifying an active internet connection on the screens of the computers being used to tabulate and process absentee ballots at TCF Center. Colbeck also stated the area had wireless routers set up with networks called “CPSStaff” and “AV_Counter.” He stated that these wireless routers were broadcasting and suggested that a computer security event that took place at 10am on Election Day could very well have been caused by the voting equipment’s connection to the internet.
I was on the ground in Detroit at the AV Counting Board. I have evidence that suggests their computers were connected to the internet despite objections to that fact by top election officials. Why is this important? Find out in the following post. https://letsfixstuff.org/2020/11/how-te ... n-results/
— Patrick Colbeck (@pjcolbeck) November 9, 2020

“All it takes to confirm the connectivity status of a Windows computer is to roll the cursor over the LAN connection icon in the bottom right corner of the display,” Colbeck’s sworn affidavit states. “When there is no internet connection, a unique icon showing a cross-hatched globe appears. I proceeded to review the terminal screens for the Tabulator and Adjudicator computers, and I observed the icon that indicates internet connection on each terminal. Other poll challengers can attest to this observation as required.” Another witness swearing out an affidavit about the internet connection, Barry Doherty – an expert in the field, having worked for Electronic Data Systems, explained that the computers being connected to the internet gave outside parties the ability to manipulate the tabulation counts Doherty added that the connectivity could also have given people outside of the facility a real-time read on what the vote tabulations were at any given moment.

Doherty and two others who saw this connection, including Colbeck, alerted the person in charge, Daniel Baxter, but were told by an unnamed individual who was serving as the chief technology person on-site “not to touch anything” and told there was no connectivity in the room. “That connection had a connection to a transmitter closer to the ceiling, which had lights coming on and off, which from my experience working in technology for many years, that signaled to me that there was some sort kind of in and out data happening,” Doherty said. Doherty also stated that Democrat Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson was on site. He did not say what knowledge she had of the computer breach, if any.

Dominion Voting Systems Shares Floor Space With Soros Group, Partnered With Soros' Friend
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/dominion-votin ... os-friend/
Category: Politics
Published: November 13, 2020

Description: So Much Nonsense In The 2020 Election
Dominion Voting Systems shares an office floor with the George Soros-funded left-wing Tides Foundation in Toronto, NATIONAL FILE has learned. Our tipster makes clear that “Soros people” are very close with Dominion, which has partnered with a voting technology company chaired by one of left-wing billionaire George Soros’ best friends and associates. Dominion was caught flipping votes from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 election, and Trump has cited data to accuse Dominion of widespread vote-flipping and vote-losing in key states. Dominion is headquartered in Toronto and has a U.S. office in Denver. The Robertson Building’s Directory of Tenants shows that Dominion Voting is listed at both Suite 200 (the suite Dominion lists publicly) and also Suite 370, which places it in neighborly range of the Tides Canada Foundation in suite 360. Tides Foundation in America, based in San Francisco, created and financially supports Tides Canada Foundation. The Tides Foundation has reportedly received more than $20 million in donations from George Soros’ groups, and Tides shares Soros’ vision for a radical left-wing makeover of Western civilization and the world. Tides has given out money to numerous left-wing groups including ACORN and Project Vote and recently created the Black Lives Matter Support Fund. This is just one link between Dominion Voting Systems and George Soros. Access Wire reported that “Dominion entered into a 2009 contract with Smartmatic and provided Smartmatic with the PCOS machines (optical scanners) that were used in the 2010 Philippine election, the biggest automated election run by a private company.” Smartmatic is chaired by Mark Malloch-Brown, who is good friends with George Soros and even called Soros his landlord at a five-bedroom house in Westchester County, New York. Malloch-Brown has worked with Soros on various projects including as vice chairman of the Open Society Institute and also Soros Fund Management. Mark Malloch-Brown is listed as a Global Board Member of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Here is Malloch-Brown photographed with his friend George Soros:


Nancy Pelosi-linked Dominion Voting Systems is under harsh condemnation from President Donald Trump and his supporters after reported vote-counting malfunctions in many of the key states. President Trump cited data reported by OANN’s Chanel Rion to state that Dominion flipped votes from Trump to Biden or lost Trump votes in massive margins in states including Pennsylvania and Georgia, where the flipped/lost vote total is higher than Joe Biden’s supposed “leads.” Dominion raised flags when officials were forced to admit that the system flipped 6,000 votes in Michigan from Trump over to his Democrat counterpart Biden. But data shows the problem to be much worse and more widespread. NOQ Report has a deep dive into the Dominion data cited by President Trump.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 12, 2020

Bloomberg reported that Dominion “hired … a high-powered firm that includes a longtime aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. … Dominion’s first-ever lobbying firm is Brownstein Farber Hyatt and Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.” Dominion Voting Systems also hired the notorious Democrat political organizing operation Act Blue.
Dominion Voting Systems HIRED Act Blue!!! Talk about a conflict of interest! This is MASSIVE!
— WE, THE PEOPLE (@HD283271) November 10, 2020

Even Democrats harshly investigated Dominion Voting Systems for its well-documented lack of security and for using Chinese parts. An Elizabeth Warren press release dated December 10, 2019 documents that Warren and fellow Democrat senators Amy Klobuchar and Ron Wyden investigated and exposed Dominion Voting Systems among two other election software systems owned by private equity. “The three vendors — Election Systems & Software, Dominion Voting Systems, and Hart InterCivic — collectively distribute voting machines and software that facilitate voting for over 90% of all eligible voters in the United States. Private equity firms reportedly own or control each of these vendors, which “have long skimped on security in favor of convenience,” leaving voting systems across the country “prone to security problems,'” the press release stated, citing election security experts. Even NBC News reported: “The source of the nation’s voting machines has become an urgent issue because of real fears that hackers, whether foreign or domestic, might tamper with the mechanics of the voting system. That has led to calls for ES&S and its competitors, Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems and Austin, Texas-based Hart Intercivic, to reveal details about their ownership and the origins of the parts, some of which come from China, that make up their machines.” House Democrats then went after Dominion Voting Systems in a 2020 hearing, with Rep. Zoe Lofgren blowing the lid off the Chinese parts used by Dominion.
"Securing our elections should not be a partisan issue." Early in 2020, Dems held a hearing with 3 major private election vendors, including DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS. The Dem. Chair revealed voting components from China, widespread Internet & hacking vulnerability & WORSE.
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 7, 2020

LAWSUIT: Nevada Electoral College Members File ‘Election Contest’ Claiming Widespread Election Fraud
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/lawsuit-nevada ... ion-fraud/
Category: Politics
Published: November 18, 2020

Description: A new lawsuit in Nevada threatens to throw a wrench into the pre-mature ‘president-elect’ claim that Joe Biden has been trying to float
As Joe Biden’s campaign tries to float the false-narrative that he should be addressed at “president-elect,” a new lawsuit brought forth in the State of Nevada threatens to move that title even further from his grasp. Electors to the United States Electoral College from Nevada, who are pledged to President Trump, filed an lawsuit, an “election contest,” on Tuesday, November 17, 2020, claiming a slew of problems with the election across the state. The Electors cite a significant number of irregularities, improprieties, and fraud in the state’s 2020 General Election process.
Republicans In Nevada Announce Lawsuit Over Alleged Fraud And Irregularities In Election (VIDEO)


— American Lookout (@amlookout) November 18, 2020

The election contest was filed in the First Judicial District Court in Carson City. The Electors – or plaintiffs as they are referred to in the legal filing, seek to have President Trump declared as the winner in Nevada, or, short of that, to have the election annulled. The contest challenges 40,000-plus votes that were cast in the presidential election. This number of votes is more than the unofficial difference between President Trump and former-Vice President Joe Biden. The plaintiffs charge that the election machines used throughout the state – which were bought and programmed by Dominion Voter Systems, are unreliable. Dominion Voter System software is under intense scrutiny since it was found to have flipped thousands of votes in several states from Republican-cast ballots to tallying those votes for the Democrat. They Electors also charge that that observers were routinely denied access to the ballot duplication process, that alleged vote-buying occurred through some Native American outreach programs, and that evidence exists that 15,000 people who voted in Nevada also voted in another state. Many on social media are falsely claiming that it is President Trump’s campaign that has brought the challenge. The plaintiff Electors are not part of the Trump campaign.

DATA: Trump Won 95% Of Bellwether Counties, Making Biden Win Statistically Improbable
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/data-trump-won ... mprobable/
Category: Politics
Published: November 19, 2020

Description: Trump campaign official Steve Cortes crunches numbers on bellwether counties, and the improbable nature of Biden's purported victory
In a video posted to Twitter on Thursday, Trump 2020 Campaign Senior Advisor for Strategy Steve Cortes took a deep dive into the 2020 election data regarding President Donald Trump’s overwhelmingly dominant performance in the United States’ bellwether counties, adding to the statistical improbability of a Joe Biden electoral victory. “Out of 3,000 counties in this country, there are 19 that have a perfect track record since 1980 of voting for the successful presidential candidate,” Cortes noted. “Donald Trump, on November 3, won 18 out of these 19 counties. Could these bellwether counties really have gotten it wrong all at the same time?” The corporate media has largely been unable to explain Trump’s dominant performance in bellwether counties, offering up only vague references to “more racially diverse populations” in response to the counties’ sharp contrast with a purported Biden victory. “Let’s look at these individual counties,” Cortes continued, and took a look at Vigo County, Indiana, which has only failed to vote for the projected winner once in over 100 years. Cortes noted that in 2008, “Obama won this swing county in Indiana by 16 percent. This election, Donald Trump almost exactly flipped that even by the number. He won it by 15 percent.”
More on the statistical case against a Biden win — bellwether counties. Here’s the data… #ChalkTalk


— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) November 19, 2020

Valencia County, New Mexico, has held a perfect track record in presidential elections since 1952. “It’s a majority Hispanic county, working-class place,” Cortes said. “In 2008, Obama won it by 8 percent. Again, like Vigo County, it flipped it almost exactly. In 2020, Donald trump won it by 10 percent.” Cortes added that while the bellwether data does not conclusively prove Trump won, when viewed in its totality alongside “the growing statistical evidence that points to the utter improbability of the Biden win, what emerges is really just two scenarios: either Biden had literally a perfect political storm on November 3 – highly unlikely – or there was massive and systemic cheating. And I believe the evidence grows toward the latter.” Cortes concluded by noting one other data point: Republicans won 27 out of 27 tossup house races in 2020, meaning a Biden win in the presidential election would stand out as such as a statistical anomaly that it would willingly suspend disbelief.

Election Fraud Expert: Michigan's Election Results Are 'Physical Impossibility'
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/election-fraud ... ssibility/
Category: Politics
Published: November 19, 2020

Description: A renowned election fraud expert has filed an affidavit that meticulously counts the many ways Michigan's election results prove to be a "physical impossibility'
The claims of unexplained anomalies by Wayne County, Michigan, election board canvassers are validated by one renowned election fraud experts who states, definitively, that Michigan’s election results – across the state and not just in Wayne County – are a “physical impossibility.” The examination of the Michigan voter data was performed by Russell Ramsland, the co-owner of Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG). His company specializes in detecting election fraud, cybersecurity, open source intelligence and global security services. Ramsland served in the Reagan administration and has worked for both NASA and MIT. In the affidavit concerning the election in Michigan, Ramsland determined – without question – that vote fraud and ballot tampering took place in the 2020 General Election in Michigan determining the results as they are currently known to be a “physical impossibility.” In addressing the Dominion Voting System, Ramsland was critical of its security over-all citing “vulnerabilities to hacking and tampering, both at the front end where Americans cast their votes, and at the back end where the votes are stored, tabulated, and reported.” Ramsland noted that the vulnerabilities described are well-known by experts in the voting securing field and that these vulnerabilities have been extensively written about.
Ramsland Affidavit
In explaining how the systems logs are tantamount to “uprotected,” Ramsland said that anyone with an elementary knowledge of computer systems could “arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries” causing a log event to take place. That the logs are unprotected makes the alterations to the tabulations undetectable. “My colleagues and I… have studied… the November 3, 2020, election results. Based on the significant anomalies and red flags that we have observed, we believe there is a significant probability that election results have been manipulated…” Ramsland wrote. His colleague, Dr. Andrew Appel, a professor of computer science at Princeton University and an election security expert, said, “I figured out how to make a slightly different computer program that just before the polls were closed it switches some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you need just 7 minutes alone with it and a screw driver.”
Ramsland Affidavit 2
Ramsland goes on to write in his affidavit that, “There are a stunning 3,276 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters based on Reported Statistics ranges from 84% to 350%… reveals 431,954 excess ballots.. This pattern strongly suggests that the *additive algorithm* was activated.”
Ramsland Affidavit 3
His affidavit goes on to say, “Until the tabulated voter turnout reached approximately 83%, Trump was generally winning between 55% and 60% of every turnout point. Then, after the counting was closed at 2:00am, the situation dramatically reserved itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes.”
Ramsland Affidavit 4
But it is the final red-flag that Ramsland and his team found that provides the smoking-gun of vote fraud and ballot tampering; that convinced Ramsland and his team there was, indeed, a crime committed in Michigan. “The final red flag is perhaps the greatest,” Ramsland wrote. “In the data are 4 spikes totaling 384, 733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hours and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the available equipment at the 4 reference locations.”
Ramsland Affidavit 5
Ramsland continued to point out that, that the Dominion system reported 46 out of 47 precincts displaying a highly unlikely 96 percent voter turnout as the number of votes cast. He added that using the Secretary of State’s number of voters in the precincts, 25 of those 47 precincts show a highly suspect 100 percent turnout. He noted that the pattern suggests with a great deal of certainty that both the fraudulent additive algorithm was activated in the code and that “batch processing of blank votes” also took place resulting in 74,119 more ballots cast than the capacity.
Ramsland Affidavit 6
Ramsland warned about Dominion Voting System machine vulnerabilities before the election was even executed.
DOMINION. "We began to look and realized how easy it is to change votes." Election security expert @RussRamsland has performed many investigations on US election machines. The most *shocking* thing about this interview is it took place just days BEFORE the election. Watch


— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 14, 2020

Michigan election canvassers in Wayne County, one of the counties flagged as having corrupted election results, have refused to certify the election.

Yale Trained Mathematician Flags 100,000 Pennsylvania Ballots As Likely Fraudulent
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/yale-trained-m ... raudulent/
Category: Politics
Published: November 20, 2020

Description: Yale and Princeton trained college professor math expert swears out affidavit claiming massive voter fraud in Pennsylvania
As the days count down to the ultimate deadline – the seating of the Electoral College, a flood of evidence that voter fraud and ballot tampering were pervasive in Pennsylvania is pouring in from experts across the country. In a sworn affidavit, a respected mathematician with an Ivy League pedigree, says his analysis of data from the November 3, 2020 General Election, coupled with phone interviews with voters throughout Pennsylvania raises more questions than provides answers. The focus of trouble for this celebrated number-cruncher centers on as many as 100,000 absentee ballots that were requested in this critical battleground state; a state where President Trump and Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden are separated by a mere 82,000 votes. Williams College Professor Steven Miller, who is a Yale University and Princeton University trained math expert, said he analyzed ballot data from Pennsylvania that was gathered by former Trump campaign data chief Matt Braynard. In addition to this raw data, Miller conducted 2,684 voter interviews. What he found was two patterns that deeply concerned him.
When the media says no evidence of widespread fraud, perhaps they mean no evidence, if you look the other way…
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) November 20, 2020

One pattern he discovered revolved around ballots that strongly suggested they were requested by someone other than a registered voter. Another pattern that caused Miller concern centered on uncounted ballots. “I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,” Miller said in the sworn affidavit. Affidavits hold penalties of perjury for those who make false statements. According to data for early and absentee ballot requests compiled by the State of Pennsylvania, there were approximately 165,000 ballots requested in the names of registered Republican voters that as of November 16, 2020 had not been counted. Referencing Miller’s findings, Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor said, “This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year’s election.” Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia in particular, have come under intense scrutiny amid an explosion of reports claiming vote fraud and ballot tampering.

ILLINOIS: Chicago Election Board Provided Dominion Complete Access For 2020 Election
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/illinois-chica ... -election/
Category: Politics
Published: November 21, 2020

Description: With election systems security at the forefront the notion that the third-largest city in the United States has completely unsecured voting is enough to invalidate their results
As the nation is focused on the lack of system security in the 2020 General Election, now comes news that not only did Dominion Voting Systems have access to the entirety of the Chicago voting system and database, they had that access for over half a year. In a March 2020 video of an emergency meeting of the Chicago Election Board (CEB), that body approved a motion to provide Dominion Voting Systems the right and capability to remotely access their machines in an administrative role during the 2020 election. Eric Coomer, the Director of Product Strategy & Security for Dominion Voting Systems, was a full participant on the call suggesting that, from the start, Dominion was the one running the elections in Chicago, the thirds-largest city in the United States and one that glows cobalt blue in its politics.
In March 2020 the Chicago Election Board Approved Providing Remote Access to Dominion for the 2020 Election – How Many Other Election Boards Did the Same Thing?
— Lara Logan (@laralogan) November 21, 2020

According to the Chicago Tribune, the votes in Chicago went lopsided toward Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden. Biden received 74.34 percent of the vote with 1,714,792 ballots cast in his name, to President Trump’s 24.06 percent with 555,001 ballots cast in his name. The video, titled “Chicago Election Board – Emergency Meeting – 2020-03-19” and available on YouTube, finds Dominion Voting executives Coomer and Nicole Nollette, Executive Vice President of Dominion Voting Systems on the call. In the meeting the CEB approves allowing election personnel, including Dominion Voting System contractors, to telework and “work from home” – or work remotely – due to the COVID emergency.

This move by the CEB allowed Dominion Voting Systems contractor personnel, including election systems administrators and technicians from Dominion, full remote access to Chicago’s election systems, files, and databases from anywhere at any time. Dominion Voting Systems administrators had free, open, and unfettered access to Chicago’s election systems, files, and data for 7-1/2 months prior to the election. They had full access to all voter registration information poll books, requests for absentee ballots, voter mailout lists, and virtually everything related to elections. If Chicago’s election results were invalidated because of vote fraud and ballot manipulation, Biden’s total of 3,450,333 votes in Illinois would be reduced to 1,735,541 while President Trump’s total of 2,434,252 votes in that state would be reduced to 1,879,251. President Trump would win Illinois’ 20 Electoral College votes by 143,710 votes, a comfortable margin.

WHISTLEBLOWERS: Biden Implicated In Dominion Voting Scam Connected To Serbia
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/whistleblowers ... to-serbia/
Category: Politics
Published: November 24, 2020

Description: The FBI covered up this information
High-level whistleblowers exclusively tell NATIONAL FILE that Dominion Voting Systems has been a “national security threat” for years and its machines, programmed in Serbia, are known for vote-flipping like the kind that Dominion was caught engaging in during the 2020 presidential election in Michigan. According to whistleblowers, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden personally visited Serbia to take part in a scheme that gave Democrats control of America’s Dominion voting machines in coordination with Eric Holder’s Justice Department. The plot is also linked to the Chinese, the Clinton Foundation, and George Soros. This article will take you through the entire globalist plot, step by step. Dana Jill Simpson and her husband Jim are election integrity and technology experts who have worked for Tides Foundation insiders (the Tides Canada Foundation shares office space in Toronto with Dominion Voting Systems’ headquarters). They are both anti-war progressives in the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democrat Party. Dana Jill Simpson has been investigating Dominion for years, and she brought her concerns about voter fraud to the FBI in 2016 — including information about Dominion — but the FBI ignored her pleas for help. Simpson said the scanners for Dominion are made by a company called Flextronics in Plano, Texas, whose CEO does business with the Chinese company Huawei. The Obama-Biden administration literally gave Dominion its market share through a 2010 forced divestiture. A March 8, 2010 press release from Eric Holder’s Department of Justice entitled “Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems & Software/Premier Election Solutions Merger” announced that DOJ was forcing a divestiture of election technology from a top company. Dominion ended up getting that technology and thus nearly a third of the electronic voting systems market in America. “Jim and I as an election team working for Harvard lawyer Cliff Arnebeck located all the DOJ Documents to prove how Dominion Voting owes its 30% Market share to an Obama-Biden DOJ Antitrust division sale done by Eric Holder. No party running for office should have any ties to a company but Biden while in office with Obama let Eric Holder handle this sale to their pet company Dominion. That my friends is as corrupt as it gets,” Dana Jill Simpson said. The Science Defies Politics blog reported: “It is not clear what products or services the company has developed. It found almost no buyers, until Obama was elected in 2008. In 2009, New York ordered a few dozens of systems from it. In 2010, Obama’s DOJ (Holder – Mueller) took the EVS unit, purchased from Diebold, away from the market leader ES&S, and gave it to Dominion. This gift included the installed base of about 30% of the US electronic voting systems (EVS) market. Within two weeks, Dominion also acquired Sequoia, which was formally spun from Smartmatic, but ties between these two companies remained. Smartmatic is a UK based EVS vendor, whose software was used by Chavez to “win” the Venezuelan referendum in 2004. Smartmatic’s unit Sequoia faced troubles in the US. Those troubles quickly ended when its assets were purchased by Dominion.”
“I got a tip that Biden took a Trip on May 20th 2009 and that is when he cut a deal to help Serbian Hackers in Belgrade where he was visiting to get control of info about ES and S Machines so he and Obama would have a better chance in 2012. Well, not only did they get a better chance but Biden had Holder force ES and S in a divesture suit in the Antitrust department in the US DOJ to give over half of ES and S to Serbian programmers for Dominion Voting Systems. Such a disgusting situation,” Dana Jill Simpson said. The date for Biden’s May 2009 Serbia trip checks out. Biden is good friends with the Serbian Crown Prince, who has prematurely congratulated Biden for supposedly getting elected president. They have visited each other at their respective houses. Here is Biden in Belgrade in 2016


Dominion programmers in Serbia have been scrambling to hide their LinkedIn accounts. Infowars reported: Screenshots show over 100 employees of the controversial voting machine company Dominion have deleted their LinkedIn profiles. On November 6th, the LinkedIn page for Dominion showed 243 employees on the site and by November 16th, only 140 remained…Why are Serbian software engineers in charge of a product being used in American elections?”


“I have one goal in this election and it is to destroy Dominion Voting,” Dana Jill Simpson said. “Anyone who stands up for this machinery is nuts and they are misleading the public about where the equipment is made. I know I have been to the Denver office and all it does is sell foreign programmed machines to US voters like they were made in Denver when they are not. The New York Times and Washington Post are misleading the public with lies. I double dare those papers and any papers in the world or other Media to visit the Denver office and then say machines and programs are made there. It is a bald face lie. The Machines are made by Flex in China for the most part and the programming is done in Serbia and Canada and the International Corporation is Barbados. They have direct ties to the Clinton Foundation in Delian Project,” Dana Jill Simpson said.
“This machinery not only stole the election from Trump but also Bernie. This bunch in Serbia and Canada of Dominion Computer Programmers (hackers) works with Hillary and with the UN on overthrowing foreign Countries with the Delian Project,” Simpson said.


A Clinton Foundation website item states:
In 2014, Dominion Voting committed to providing emerging and post-conflict democracies with access to voting technology through its philanthropic support to the DELIAN Project, as many emerging democracies suffer from post-electoral violence due to the delay in the publishing of election results. Over the next three years, Dominion Voting will support election technology pilots with donated Automated Voting Machines (AVM), providing an improved electoral process, and therefore safer elections. As a large number of election staff are women, there will be an emphasis on training women, who will be the first to benefit from the skills transfer training and use of AVMs. It is estimated that 100 women will directly benefit from election technology skills training per pilot election.

Dominion Voting Systems shares an office floor with the George Soros-funded left-wing Tides Foundation in Toronto, NATIONAL FILE has learned. Our tipster makes clear that “Soros people” are very close with Dominion, which has partnered with a voting technology company chaired by one of left-wing billionaire George Soros’ best friends and associates. Dominion was caught flipping votes from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 election, and Trump has cited data to accuse Dominion of widespread vote-flipping and vote-losing in key states. Dominion is headquartered in Toronto and has a U.S. office in Denver. The Robertson Building’s Directory of Tenants shows that Dominion Voting is listed at both Suite 200 (the suite Dominion lists publicly) and also Suite 370, which places it in neighborly range of the Tides Canada Foundation in suite 360. Tides Foundation in America, based in San Francisco, created and financially supports Tides Canada Foundation. The Tides Foundation has reportedly received more than $20 million in donations from George Soros’ groups, and Tides shares Soros’ vision for a radical left-wing makeover of Western civilization and the world. Tides has given out money to numerous left-wing groups including ACORN and Project Vote and recently created the Black Lives Matter Support Fund.


More evidence is here:



This is just one link between Dominion Voting Systems and George Soros. Access Wire reported that “Dominion entered into a 2009 contract with Smartmatic and provided Smartmatic with the PCOS machines (optical scanners) that were used in the 2010 Philippine election, the biggest automated election run by a private company.” Smartmatic is chaired by Mark Malloch-Brown, who is good friends with George Soros and even called Soros his landlord at a five-bedroom house in Westchester County, New York. Malloch-Brown has worked with Soros on various projects including as vice chairman of the Open Society Institute and also Soros Fund Management. Mark Malloch-Brown is listed as a Global Board Member of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Here is Malloch-Brown photographed with his friend George Soros:


Nancy Pelosi-linked Dominion Voting Systems is under harsh condemnation from President Donald Trump and his supporters after reported vote-counting malfunctions in many of the key states. President Trump cited data reported by OANN’s Chanel Rion to state that Dominion flipped votes from Trump to Biden or lost Trump votes in massive margins in states including Pennsylvania and Georgia, where the flipped/lost vote total is higher than Joe Biden’s supposed “leads.” Dominion raised flags when officials were forced to admit that the system flipped 6,000 votes in Michigan from Trump over to his Democrat counterpart Biden. But data shows the problem to be much worse and more widespread. NOQ Report has a deep dive into the Dominion data cited by President Trump. Bloomberg reported that Dominion “hired … a high-powered firm that includes a longtime aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. … Dominion’s first-ever lobbying firm is Brownstein Farber Hyatt and Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.” Dominion Voting Systems also hired the notorious Democrat political organizing operation Act Blue. Even Democrats harshly investigated Dominion Voting Systems for its well-documented lack of security and for using Chinese parts. An Elizabeth Warren press release dated December 10, 2019 documents that Warren and fellow Democrat senators Amy Klobuchar and Ron Wyden investigated and exposed Dominion Voting Systems among two other election software systems owned by private equity. “The three vendors — Election Systems & Software, Dominion Voting Systems, and Hart InterCivic — collectively distribute voting machines and software that facilitate voting for over 90% of all eligible voters in the United States. Private equity firms reportedly own or control each of these vendors, which “have long skimped on security in favor of convenience,” leaving voting systems across the country “prone to security problems,'” the press release stated, citing election security experts. Even NBC News reported: “The source of the nation’s voting machines has become an urgent issue because of real fears that hackers, whether foreign or domestic, might tamper with the mechanics of the voting system. That has led to calls for ES&S and its competitors, Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems and Austin, Texas-based Hart Intercivic, to reveal details about their ownership and the origins of the parts, some of which come from China, that make up their machines.” House Democrats then went after Dominion Voting Systems in a 2020 hearing, with Rep. Zoe Lofgren blowing the lid off the Chinese parts used by Dominion.

Forensic Computer Scientist: Up to 120,000 Questionable Votes in Pennsylvania
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/forensic-compu ... nsylvania/
Category: Politics
Published: November 28, 2020

Description: Yet more expert testimony that tries to explain te overwhelming amount of evidence tat points to vote fraud, ballot tampering, and a stolen election in Pennsylvania
As the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rules against President Trump’s attorney’s in the matter of vote fraud and ballot tampering in Pennsylvania, the path is cleared for the mountain of credible evidence in support of those claims to finally be brought forward in a matter of constitutionality to the United States Supreme Court. A critical piece of evidence was brought forward at a hearing in Gettysburg Wednesday. Gregory Stenstrom of Delaware County, self-identified as a former commanding officer in the Navy, a forensic computer scientist with expertise on security and fraud issues, and a poll watcher, alleged this week that 47 USB cards used during the state’s Nov. 3 election have gone missing. He also stated that as many as 120,000 votes cast in the election should be called into question, based on his examination of the evidence and his expertise in forensic computer science. “I personally observed USB cards being uploaded to voting machines by the voting machine warehouse supervisor on multiple occasions,” Stenstrom testified. “This person is not being observed, he’s not a part of the process that I can see, and he is walking in with baggies of USBs.” Stenstrom suggested that the cards very well may have been used in ballot tampering actions, adding illegal votes to the state’s vote count. He also charged that there was a complete lack of procedural oversight on how state election workers handled ballots.
PENNSYLVANIA "47 USB card are missing" "My name is Gregory Strenstrom, I am from Delaware county, former Commanding Officer in the Navy, veteran of foreign wars, CEO of my own private company, a data scientist & forensic computer scientist & an expert in security & fraud."
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020

“In all cases the chain of custody was broken,” Stenstrom said. “It was broken for the mail-in ballots, the drop-box ballots, the Election Day USB card flash drives. In all cases they didn’t follow any of the procedures defined by the Board of Delaware County of Elections.” Stenstrom also testified that law enforcement personnel, who were on scene during the ballot processing and tabulation processes, failed to act after he reported the mishandling of ballots. “I literally begged multiple law enforcement agencies to go get the forensic evidence from the computers,” Stenstrom said. “It’s a simple process. It wouldn’t have taken more than an hour to image all 5 machines. That was never done despite my objections and that was three weeks ago.” Pennsylvania – which moved forward in initiating the vote certification process Tuesday – is one of several critical battleground states where the Trump 2020 Campaign has charged voter fraud and ballot tampering. Pennsylvania awards 20 electoral votes to the winner.

THE KRAKEN: Retired General Says US Military Group. Nicknamed 'Kraken', Seized Dominion Servers in Germany
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/forensic-compu ... nsylvania/
Category: Politics
Published: November 30, 2020

Description: "They are guilty of treason," said Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney
In a groundbreaking interview with WVW-TV, retired Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney described a raid in which U.S. Special Operations Forces successfully seized Dominion Voting System servers held in a CIA “server farm” facility in Frankfurt, Germany. The former General also suggested that the term “Kraken,” widely used by Attorney Sidney Powell, is referring to the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion, which is located on Fort Huachuca, Arizona. McInerney clarified that Powell had been using data provided by the 305th, and others, as fuel for legal battles, including her Georgia lawsuit, which alleges that the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians used Dominion to interfere in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. “Sidney and the President through, I believe, General Flynn, have got the ‘Kraken’ organization, the 305 Military Intelligence Battalion, working with them,” said McInerney. “Because in all of this, we have not seen any footprints of the DOJ, of the FBI, nor the CIA on the friendly side. It’s been on the ‘Deep State’ side.”
WOW. Listen to General McInerney describe the Kraken and the raid of the CIA facility in Frankfurt, Germany.
— TheSharpEdge (@TheSharpEdge1) November 29, 2020

“Special Operations Forces seized those, that facility, so they have those servers” said McInerney. McInerney added that the raid did not go “without incident” and stated that U.S. soldiers faced casualties during the operation:
“My initial report is that U.S. soldiers were killed in that operation. Now, that was a CIA operation, so that’s the very worrisome thing. Did that occur because of what Mary and I, and Allen, were notifying on Sunday and the Monday in different networks, that this was going to happen, that they were using Hammer and Scorecard…”

National File was able to quickly verify that Powell quoted a former member of the 305th in the lawsuit, which declared that “a former electronic intelligence analyst under the 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence” told her that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran” to manipulate the election. When WVW-TV’s Brannon Howse pushed, “But you are saying that it was a CIA facility, and that was where the server was taken from, by these special forces, was a CIA facility in Germany?” McInerney responded saying, “Yes. That’s correct. Frankfurt, Germany.” He continues to explain how various elements of the U.S. government, such as the “Deep State”, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary, are involved in “this coup d’etat.” “This is treason. Benedict Arnold gave away West Point, or tried to, in the Revolutionary War. We haven’t seen treason to this magnitude ever in our history” said McInerney. McInerney elaborates further by stating that President Donald Trump must not leave the Oval Office until the American people have “had a full disclosure of what’s going on.” “What you’re saying is that President Trump needs to fulfill his oath that he took to defend America against enemies both foreign and domestic, and he must not let deadlines stop him from fulfilling that oath. Is that what I hear you say?” Howse asked. McInerney responded by saying “That is exactly what you heard me say Brannon.” The general claimed to be confident that widespread voter fraud will be revealed upon the inspection of the Dominion servers seized in Germany. “We can’t have this absolute disregard for the laws of the land and by judges, and by legislatures. They must get hold of this.” McInerney added, “There is a path, but I believe they’re going to, the Democrats, are going to think ‘this is politics’ and they’re going to try to shut that down.” “Well if they do, then, the American people must demand that the President stay in office until this is cleared up, because it’s treason. It’s a coup d’etat against the government of the United States and we cannot accept that.” The full interview, alongside WVW’s bombshell exclusive interview with Gen. Michael Flynn, is available on their website.

ANALYSIS: After 100 Votes Sampled, Biden's Arizona Lead May Diminish to 0.19% of Vote, Disappear Entirely
National File

URL: https://nationalfile.com/analysis-after ... -entirely/
Category: Politics
Published: December 30, 2020

Description: With only 10.3% adjudication, Trump wins the election by 40 votes
Following an examination of a 100 vote sample conducted by the Arizona GOP, analysis by National File has concluded Biden’s lead in the state could drop down to 0.19% of the total votes cast. On Wednesday, Arizona GOP Chair Dr Kelli Ward revealed the results of the examination of a 100 vote sample that they had conducted, after being granted access to the ballots by Judge Randall Warner. The votes examined in this batch were reduplicated ballots, in that they are a copy made from an original vote when it cannot be tabulated. This copying is meant to be done by a bipartisan team of county workers, which Ward alleges did not happen in many cases. In the 100 vote batch, two votes were discovered that were of concern. Arizona GOP lawyer Jack Wilenchik wrote in a court filing that one original ballot contained “was clearly a vote for Trump,” but the “duplicate ballot switched the vote to Biden,” while a second Trump vote was completely discarded, due to the duplicate ballot also including a “blank” vote for a write-in presidential candidate.
In today's update, Chairwoman @kelliwardaz announces the findings from our investigation of 100 duplicate ballots, in which TWO votes were discovered to have been altered and removed from President @realDonaldTrump's total.


— Arizona Republican Party (@AZGOP) December 2, 2020

“Thank goodness that Judge Warner said he wanted to err on the side of transparency and let us look at these,” Ward said in a video released to Twitter. “Those media propagandists who say there is no evidence of fraud can now shut up.” “It looks like this election has attempted to have been stolen from President Trump,” Ward added, noting that the attorneys for Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and the Biden electors wanted the results of the examination to be kept secret. “This shows us that these Democrats are anti-transparency, and potentially covering up fraud,” Ward continued. “We will not stop looking until all of this is brought to light.” National File has undergone an exclusive and extensive mathematical analysis to discover what the total vote count, and therefore Biden’s Arizona lead, may look like if the findings of this sample size can be extrapolated to state level. It is unknown how many ballots required duplication, as the statewide canvass did not specify this. National File is therefore using the pre-election estimate of Maricopa County, which suggested they may see around a 2-4% reduplication rate. Before entering the analysis, it is important to note that we will be using the total votes cast in the state for all candidates as our starting number, (3,397,388), rather than the total votes cast for Trump and Biden together, as we are assuming that the 100 vote sample was a fair sample, and was therefore likely to include votes for other candidates. The initial vote sample returned a rate of 2% of the votes in the sample that should have been cast for Trump that were not.

Arizona-Biden-Lose-1-300x180.jpg (9.94 KiB) Not viewed yet

There are also two types of vote change happening here. Biden currently leads Trump by 10,457 votes. The vote not counted for President Trump would remove one vote from him, and the vote that was initially given to Biden, but returned from Trump, would reduce the total vote difference by two, as it removes one away from Biden, and giving one more to Trump. We will therefore be multiplying the total error votes in our calculation by 1.5 to correct for this. This is equivalent to a 3% change. Using the 2% lower bound reduplication rate from Maricopa County, 1,359 ballots would have been counted in error. Assuming the split between Trump votes purely lost and Trump votes given to Biden remained the same in the sample, then Biden’s lead would drop down by 2,038 votes to 8,419. When using the 4% upper bound reduplication rate, 2,718 ballots would have been cast in error. Assuming the same split as before, this would reduce Biden’s lead in Arizona down by 4,077 votes to 6,380. This lead is 0.19% of all total votes cast in Arizona. However, it is reasonable to assume the reduplication rate could be far higher than the pre-election estimates from Maricopa. During the election integrity hearing in Arizona on Monday, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and expert witness Colonel Phil Waldron referred to a witness who saw all day “election officials constantly pressing the green button [on the voting machine] when somebody was voting.” This green button in question is the one that is pressed when an error ballot is needed to be created, and the votes would then be “put into a batch file that could be adjudicated.” To be “put into a batch file” is simply another term for being electronically reduplicated. If this button was being pressed “all day,” all across the state, then it is not unreasonable to suggest a higher reduplication rate than expected. Using the figures from our Arizona analysis, President Trump would only need a reduplication rate of 10.3% to flip the state back to him, winning by a vote lead of 41 votes. However, to win Arizona, President Trump would only need this to be the case if no other fraud or voting irregularities are discovered. Colonel Waldron linked the reduplication of ballots to the SharpieGate controversy, where Republican leaning voters were instructed to use Sharpies, not ballpoint pens when voting. “The idea is that [there would be] bleedthrough on the ballot, [and therefore] the scanners would cause an error ballot,” Waldron said. Arizona Representative Dr. Paul Gosar extrapolated the 3% vote change discovered and reasonably hypothesized this to be the rate of fraud seen throughout the state for Biden – not an unreasonable assumption when the votes discovered were so apparently blatantly changed. “If the 3% fraud rate remains on a larger sample, Trump easily wins Arizona,” Dr. Gosar tweeted.
2. The audit found: one Trump vote arbitrarily excluded. Another Trump vote struck and then fraudulently added to Biden. Total fraud averaging 3%. Biden margin of fraud less than .05%. Thus if 3% fraud rate remains on larger sample Trump easily wins Arizona. @ali @Cernovich
— Paul Gosar (@DrPaulGosar) December 3, 2020

Maricopa County on Wednesday offered a further 2,500 additional duplicated ballots for the Arizona GOP to look through. This further analysis will likely change the percentages originally discovered from what Ward admitted was a “very, very small” initial sample. The Arizona GOP announced that it will be posting another “big” update on Thursday, according to an announcement posted on their Twitter page.
Wow, another BIG update tomorrow!
— Arizona Republican Party (@AZGOP) December 2, 2020

President Trump seemed to reference a large number of voting irregularities, potentially tied to SharpieGate, that could have led to a larger than usual number of adjudicated ballots.
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

‘Slow leak’: Text messages cast doubt on Georgia officials’ ‘burst pipe’ excuse for pause in counting

Postby smix » Fri Nov 13, 2020 4:32 am

‘Slow leak’: Text messages cast doubt on Georgia officials’ ‘burst pipe’ excuse for pause in counting

URL: https://www.news.com.au/world/north-ame ... debe684392
Category: Politics
Published: November 13, 2020

Description: An “unprecedented” decision on election night caused outrage – and now texts have blown apart the official story, raising more questions. Officials in Georgia have not been able to produce any invoices or work orders related to a “burst pipe” at Atlanta’s State Farm Arena that was blamed for an abrupt pause in vote counting on election night. The only evidence for the burst pipe, released under freedom-of-information laws, was a text message exchange in which one senior employee at the stadium described it as “highly exaggerated … a slow leak that caused about an hour and a half delay” and that “we contained it quickly – it did not spread”. “Beyond the lack of documentary evidence of the inspection or repair of a ruptured pipe, we are being asked to believe that there is not one single picture of this allegedly ruptured pipe, at a time and in a place where virtually everything is recorded and documented,” Georgia lawyer Paul Dzikowski, who obtained the text messages, told news.com.au in an email on Wednesday night. The right-wing Gateway Pundit website first reported the story on Wednesday. President Donald Trump mentioned the burst pipe in his speech last Friday, where he claimed key battleground states where he was leading Mr Biden suspiciously stopped counting on Tuesday night. “In Georgia, a pipe burst in a far away location, totally unrelated to the location of what was happening and they stopped counting for four hours,” he said, in a claim that was disputed by fact checkers. On Monday, Mr Dzikowski sent an open records request concerning the burst pipe to the Atlanta-Fulton County Recreation Authority – the state authority that owns State Farm Arena. “Please produce … all ‘public records’ related to the burst pipe at State Farm Arena that occurred on or about November 3, 2020, which impacted the counting of ballots by Fulton County authorities, including and not limited to internal and external communications with any person(s), communications with Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections, memoranda, notes, work orders, requisitions, invoices, repair records, and all other public records,” Mr Dzikowski wrote. AFCRA executive director Kerry Stewart responded less than half an hour later attaching “the only document responsive to your request” – a text message exchange between an unidentified person and Geoffrey Stiles, vice president of facilities for the Atlanta Hawks NBA team. “I just heard a water pipe burst at SFA that will cause vote count delay. Has this affected the AFCRA office? I think they were counting votes next door,” the sender, believed by Mr Dzikowski to be Mr Stewart, wrote at 7.42pm. “No sir – it was highly exaggerated – it was a slow leak that caused about an hour and a half delay,” Mr Stiles replied at 7.43pm. “We contained it quickly – it did not spread – we just wanted to protect the equipment.”

A text from Geoffrey Stiles, VP of facilities at State Farm Arena.Source:Supplied

Mr Dzikowski submitted a similar request to Fulton County, which also came up empty. “The Fulton County attorney’s office responded on behalf of the County and concluded there are ‘no responsive records’ related to the alleged burst pipe or water main break – which are two completely different things, by the way,” he said. “‘Water main’ refers to high-volume transmission pipes running underground along road rights-of-way and outside the buildings, and a ‘pipe’ would refer to the distribution piping within the structure. Either way, I would expect there to be a host of records generated (texts, emails, work orders, interdepartmental pay requisitions, etc.) if there had been a serious water leak in a major sports arena.” Mr Dzikowski, who spent “the better part of 10 years” as outside counsel to five different county and municipal governments, said he submitted the open records request “simply because I believed it would be the easiest way to either confirm or refute the Fulton County Board of Elections’ proffered reason for halting the counting of ballots”. “Please understand that the Board’s decision to stop counting was unprecedented,” he said. “There are many residents of Georgia, and Fulton County in particular, who doubt the official story. I simply wanted to know the answer for my own edification. I am a concerned citizen who is worried about the level of corruption that has taken hold at the local, state, and national levels in my country.” News.com.au has contacted State Farm Arena for a response. Fulton Commission Chairman Robb Pitts told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Tuesday evening that the pipe burst just after 6am and was repaired within two hours. The newspaper noted that the burst pipe wasn’t mentioned by any county officials during a 10am press conference. “As of 5pm, Fulton had scanned 86,191 of the 130,517 absentee-by-mail ballots received, which doesn’t include the ballots received in today’s mail,” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution wrote at the time. They planned to stop scanning absentee ballots at 10.30pm and pick it up back in the morning. No official could explain before press time why Fulton was stopping its count of absentee ballots at that time, only saying that was the procedure.” There is no suggestion that the confusion around the pipe bursting story is linked to any claims of widespread voter fraud or other conspiracy theories. State Republicans have also raised concerns about the election, particularly the vote counting process in Fulton County, which takes in the state capital and most populous city, Atlanta. “Fulton County elections officials told the media and our observers that they were shutting down the tabulation centre at State Farm Arena at 10.30pm on election night only to continue counting ballots in secret until 1am,” Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer said on Twitter earlier this week.
Designated Republican observers and members of the public have been denied the opportunity to observe the counting of votes as required by law. Thousands of ballots have been unlawfully counted in secret.
— David Shafer (@DavidShafer) November 11, 2020

“No one disputes that Fulton County elections officials falsely announced that the counting of ballots would stop at 10.30pm. No one disputes that Fulton County elected officials unlawfully resumed the counting of ballots after our observers left the centre.” It comes after Georgia, a key battleground state where Joe Biden narrowly defeated Mr Trump by just 0.3 percentage points, ordered a full hand recount and audit of the vote. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced on Wednesday that so far 97 counties had sent their final numbers, with Mr Biden leading Mr Trump by 14,111 votes out of just under 4.93 million in the state. The Republican official, who has come under heavy fire from his own party over his handling of the election, said he would implement a “risk-limiting audit” of the presidential race after the final county certifications. “With the margin being so close, it will require a full, by-hand recount in each county,” Mr Raffensperger said. “This will help build confidence. It will be an audit, a recount and a recanvass, all at once.” Georgia, which has 16 electoral college votes, must certify its results by next Friday, November 20. “It will be a heavy lift, but we will work with the counties to get this done in time for our state certification,” Mr Raffensperger said. He denied he was ordering the recount because the Trump campaign had requested it, saying “no, we’re doing this because it makes the most sense”. “When you have five million votes and the margin is so close, 14,000, if we pulled out 10,000 votes, all of the sudden you could say, well this is the person that won,” he said. “You pull out 100,000, it says this person won. You pull out a million, this person won. And that’s why mathematically you actually have to do a full by-hand recount because the margin is so close.” After the hand recount, the loser can request a second recount by machine. Even if Georgia’s result flipped – which has only happened in three out of 31 statewide recounts since 2000, all with margins of under 300 votes – Mr Biden would still have enough electoral college votes to win the White House.
Mrs. Deborah Jean Christiansen of Roswell, Georgia was registered to vote on October 5. Then she voted in the election. The only problem? She passed away a year and a half ago, in May 2019. Sadly, Mrs. Christiansen is a victim of voter fraud.


— Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) November 11, 2020

The Trump campaign has made as-yet-unproven allegations of voter fraud and other irregularities. One lawsuit last week seeking to disqualify around 50 mail-in ballots, which a Republican observer claimed had arrived after the deadline, was thrown out by a judge. On Wednesday, the Trump campaign came out with fresh allegations of dead people casting votes in Georgia, citing a handful of newspaper obituaries and voter records. “Mrs Deborah Jean Christiansen of Roswell, Georgia was registered to vote on October 5,” the campaign said in a statement. “Then she voted in the election. The only problem? She passed away a year and a half ago, in May 2019. Sadly, Mrs Christiansen is a victim of voter fraud.” Mr Raffensperger has not yet responded to the Trump campaign’s latest claims. During his press conference on Wednesday, he insisted all allegations would be looked into but defended the state’s election workers. “My office will continue to investigate each and every instance of illegal voting,” he said. “Double voting, felon voting, people voting out of state – if you report it, we will investigate it. We will continue to follow and enforce the law.” He said election workers “are the ones that do the hard work on the ground of making sure that all legal votes will be counted”. “Their job is hard, they executed their responsibilities, and they did their job,” he said. “These men and women, and my office, will continue to follow the law and count every legal vote. We have all worked hard to bring fair and accurate counts to ensure that the will of the voters is reflected in the final count and that every voter will have confidence in the outcome whether their candidate won or lost.”
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

I Was In Philadelphia Watching Fraud Happen. Here’s How It Went Down

Postby smix » Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:39 pm

I Was In Philadelphia Watching Fraud Happen. Here’s How It Went Down
The Federalist

URL: https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/10/i- ... kx.twitter
Category: Politics
Published: November 10, 2020

Description: At issue was President Trump’s request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center. Legacy media are lying when they claim that all of President Trump’s allegations of voter fraud are baseless. I know, because I argued a case on the president’s behalf in federal court in Philadelphia. t issue was President Trump’s request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center. CNN and others claim he “lost.” That’s false: he won. As I made that argument on behalf of the president’s campaign, I can tell you what really happened. President Trump went to court about two problems: First, only a handful of Republican observers—substantially fewer than the Democrats had there—were being admitted to the room at the Philadelphia Convention Center where inspections were being conducted. Second, the few who could get in weren’t permitted to get close enough to see what was actually happening. The most important questions all have to ask are: Why all the hiding? What’s being hidden? At the Convention Center counting location, I personally observed dozens of Trump campaign volunteers being barred from the counting room even though they’d been properly registered as observers. That’s why I urged Pam Bondi and Corey Lewandowski, who were on the scene, to authorize the filing of a request that a federal court order the Board of Elections to stop this nonsense. More hiding: despite a binding order of the state’s Commonwealth Court, the handful of Republican observers who could get into the room weren’t being allowed up to the barrier set at six feet from the closest tables where work was being done. So even though they were in the room where it was happening, they had no way to tell what was happening. If there’s no fraud, why is the Democrat-controlled Board of Elections unwilling to let people get close enough to actually see what its people are doing? So on a borrowed laptop at around 2 p.m. on election day, I typed up a very short document to start a federal lawsuit and to request that the federal court intervene to prohibit these unfair practices. At about 4:30 p.m., its filing was authorized by the campaign. The federal judge ordered a hearing that began at 5:30 p.m. and went for two hours. In open court, the judge compelled the Board of Elections to agree that the Republicans could have up to 60 representatives in the room. That was a huge victory, not only for Republicans but for anyone who actually wants to have a vote tabulation worthy of belief. He also compelled the board to agree that all observers, Democrat or Republican, could get up to the six-foot barrier. While the Democrats claimed that of course, of course, they had always been letting people in and letting them up to the barrier, I had a long list of witnesses who were prepared to testify that this was false. The judge told the defendants pointedly that if they didn’t do what they’d promised in his courtroom they would, he had plenty of authority to make them keep their word. Having secured this agreement from the Board of Elections, the court dismissed the president’s motion for court-ordered relief as moot. Courts often do that when they secure an agreement between the parties. It means the court doesn’t have to issue an order, which would be appealable, granting or denying the motion, and it means the court doesn’t have to write an opinion. What it doesn’t mean is that the request made on behalf of President Trump to stop the election fraud was moot, despite the false spin CNN and other mainstream media put on it. All of this was a victory for President Trump and anyone else who believes in open government. I’m no longer surprised by anti-Trump non-news coming from the likes of CNN. But I cannot imagine why Pennsylvania Republican leaders have suggested there’s no reason to think that anything wrong or fraudulent is going on in the counting of Pennsylvania’s votes. If that were true, why in the world would the Democratic-controlled city government be working so hard to keep Republicans out of the room where those votes are being counted? In a world where every car that drives down the street is on video, why isn’t all of this counting being conducted in broad daylight, under watchful eyes? What do they have to hide? Other people have gathered substantial evidence that there are indeed things to hide, including this video showing, among other things, footage of government officials wearing Joe Biden facemasks filling in blanks in already-submitted mail-in votes. The hearing I attended wasn’t about that, but it was about the conditions that make that possible. No one who wants a legitimate vote count should be working to keep observers out of the room where the votes are counted. Yet for some reason the City of Philadelphia sent three lawyers, including the city solicitor himself, to a hearing to try to persuade a federal judge that he shouldn’t even bother addressing President Trump’s request. Fortunately, the federal judge didn’t take that advice, and he forced the Board of Elections to do the right thing. I call that a solid victory for everyone—except for those with something to hide. For some reason, all of this hiding was being done by Democrats, for Biden.

Lawsuit Claims 40,000-Plus Fraudulent Ballots Pumped Through Detroit For Joe Biden
The Federalist

URL: https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/12/la ... joe-biden/
Category: Politics
Published: November 12, 2020

Description: Eyewitnesses testify they saw approximately 40,000 irregular ballots arrive in vehicles with out-of-state plates during an early-morning poll worker shift change Nov. 4. That's not even the half of it.
A lawsuit filed Nov. 8 in Michigan alleges that Detroit, Mich. elections officials oversaw and openly encouraged election fraud totaling many “tens of thousands” of fraudulent ballots, plus other illegal election-tampering. The complaint filed by an in-state conservative nonprofit legal group alleges numerous instances of illegal and suspicious activity in the Democrat stronghold encompassing Detroit, Wayne County. President Trump’s legal team has filed a separate lawsuit alleging additional voting crimes and irregularities in the county. The current results of the presidential race in Michigan suggest an approximately 146,000-vote gap between President Trump and Joe Biden, and an 84,000-vote gap between U.S. Senate candidates Gary Peters (D) and John James (R). The Associated Press and the state’s Democrat officials say Biden has won the state’s electoral votes and that Trump’s claims of fraud are insulting and inaccurate. Wayne County is estimated to have been the site of some 850,000 votes this year. If this lawsuit is accurate, however, a massive portion of these votes is fraudulent. The Great Lakes Justice Center complaint provides “eyewitness accounts and direct evidence” that “approximately 40,000” unsecured, irregular ballots arrived in vehicles with out-of-state license plates at Detroit’s only vote-counting location, TCF Center, in the wee hours of the Nov. 4 morning during a shift change in election workers. Eyewitnesses signed affidavits saying that every one of this group of 40,000 ballots they saw “was counted orally and attributed only to Democratic candidates,” specifically Joe Biden. Other eyewitnesses signed affidavits under penalty of perjury stating they saw multiple other piles of ballots, together additionally numbering in the tens of thousands, that were counted despite violating election law, sometimes at the direction of local election officials. This allegedly happened both before the election, during early voting, and during the election and subsequent vote count. “After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center, Defendant election officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots were processed,” the complaint says. It also alleges:
* “Defendant election officials and workers allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact, election officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from observing. Defendants permitted thousands of ballots to be filled out by hand and duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.”
* Poll challenger Daniel Gustafson signed an affidavit stating he “witnessed tens of thousands of ballots being delivered to the TCF Center that were not in any approved, sealed, or tamper-proof container…Large quantities of ballots were delivered to the TCF Center in what appeared to be mail bins with open tops. Contrary to law, these ballot bins and containers did not have lids, were not sealed, and did not have the capability of having a metal seal.”
The Federalist reported earlier this week on one affidavit filed in this complaint, from former Michigan Assistant Attorney General Zachary Larsen, but there are many, many more, and the details are scandalous.
The First Big Batch of 40,000 Suspicious Votes
An affidavit signed by poll challenger Andrew Sitto tells more about the 40,000 ballots he says he saw brought in: “At approximately 4:00 a.m. on November 4, 2020, tens of thousands of ballots were suddenly brought into the counting room through the back door…by vehicles with out-of-state license plates (Exhibit C). It was observed that all of these new ballots were cast for Joe Biden,” summarizes the complaint. Sitto’s affidavit expands on what he saw while observing the vote-counting process from election night, Nov. 3, overnight into the early morning of Nov. 4. He says by 4:30 a.m. on Nov. 4, right before a 5 a.m. shift change between poll watchers, one of two men in charge of the vote counting “got on the microphone and stated that another shipment of absentee ballots would be arriving and would have to be counted.” “At approximately 4:30 a.m., tens of thousands of ballots were brought in and placed on eight long tables. Unlike the other ballots, these boxes were brought in from the rear of the room. The same procedure was performed on the ballots that arrived at approximately 4:30 a.m., but I specifically noticed that every ballot I observed was cast for Joe Biden,” his affidavit states. “While counting these new ballots, I heard counters say at least five or six times that all five or six ballots were for Joe Biden. All ballots sampled that I heard and observed were for Joe Biden.”
There Was a Second Big Dump of Suspicious Ballots
The lawsuit alleges the 40,000 vote dump is not the only suspicious one observed on Nov. 4 in Detroit. Poll challenger Robert Cushman attested that on Nov. 4, 2020 at approximately 9 p.m., he “was surprised to see numerous new boxes of ballots arrive at the TCF Center in the evening… I estimate these boxes contained several thousand new ballots when they appeared.” He noticed that none of the names on these new ballots were of registered voters, which poll workers were supposed to verify. “I saw the computer operators at several counting boards manually adding the names and addresses of these thousands of ballots to the QVF system,” his affidavit states. “When I asked what the possible justification was to counting ballots from unknown, unverified ‘persons,’ I was told by election supervisors that the Wayne County Clerk’s Office had ‘checked them out.'” Subsequently, Cushman challenged the entire process encompassing these “thousands of ballots.” Election workers are supposed to match the name on each ballot with a registered voter on the state’s official lists. Instead, Cushman says, the Wayne County Clerk’s officers told poll workers to add all the names on the ballots from these boxes to the state’s list, giving them all a false birth date of January 1, 1900. Election rules also say absentee voters are supposed to be added to the state’s registered voter lists before 9 p.m. on Nov. 3, election day. All of the voters for these ballots were added after this deadline, at the direction of local election officials, Cushman says. None of the names of these new ballots corresponded with any registered voter,” the complaint says.
Whistleblower: Election Officials Broke the Law Big-Time
One of the affidavits is signed by a Detroit Elections Department worker whose identity is concealed in the court documents under whistleblower protections. A Great Lakes Justice Center attorney told The Federalist she snuck out yellow sticky notes during ballot processing to be able to stay and observe some of the illegal activities alleged in her affidavit. The affidavit alleges numerous illegal activities conducted by Wayne County election officials, affecting thousands if not tens of thousands of votes atop all those outlined above. The whistleblower says that during her work processing early votes, “I was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of these absentee ballot packages to be dated earlier than they were actually sent. The supervisor was making announcements for all workers to engage in this practice.” If true, this is fraud and election tampering. The same sort of fraud, she alleges, happened on Nov. 4. That day, she says, “I was instructed to improperly pre-date the absentee ballots receive date that were not in the QVF [the state’s registered voter list] as if they had been received on or before November 3, 2020. I was told to alter teh [sic] information in the QVF to falsely show that the absentee ballots had been received in time to be valid. I estimate that this was done to thousands of ballots.” Throughout her daily elections work in September through November 2020, the whistleblower says, “I directly observed, on a daily basis, City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party.” This is also illegal. “I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. I witnessed these election workers and employees going over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.” The whistleblower also says Detroit election officials actively avoided verifying voters’ identities: “During the last two weeks while working at this satellite location, I was specifically instructed by my supervisor not to ask for a driver’s license or any photo I.D. when a person was trying to vote.” The whistleblower also alleges encouraged voter fraud through the possibility of double voting: “I observed a large number of people who came to the satellite location to vote in-person, but they had already applied for an absentee ballot. These people were allowed to vote in-person and were not required to return the mailed absentee ballot or sign an affidavit that the voter lost the mailed absentee ballot.” The suit names the City of Detroit, the Detroit Election Commission, Detroit Clerk Janice Winfrey, Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett, and the Wayne County Board of Canvassers as defendants. The Democratic Party has made a motion to join the lawsuit as defendants, meaning it is volunteering to be also sued for these alleged crimes.

5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms
The Federalist

URL: https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/5- ... ion-norms/
Category: Politics
Published: November 23, 2020

Description: Surely the journalist class should be intrigued by the historic implausibility of Joe Biden’s victory. That they are not is curious, to say the least.


In all the excitement among objective journalists for Joe Biden’s declared victory, reporters are missing how extraordinary the Democrat’s performance was in the 2020 election. It’s not just that the former vice president is on track to become the oldest president in American history, it’s what he managed to accomplish at the polls this year. Candidate Joe Biden was so effective at animating voters in 2020 that he received a record number of votes, more than 15 million more than Barack Obama received in his re-election of 2012. Amazingly, he managed to secure victory while also losing in almost every bellwether county across the country. No presidential candidate has been capable of such electoral jujitsu until now. While Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton’s 2016 totals in every urban county in the United States, he outperformed her in the metropolitan areas of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Even more surprising, the former VP put up a record haul of votes, despite Democrats’ general failures in local House and state legislative seats across the nation. He accomplished all this after receiving a record low share of the primary vote compared to his Republican opponent heading into the general election. Clearly, these are tremendous and unexpected achievements that would normally receive sophisticated analysis from the journalist class but have somehow gone mostly unmentioned during the celebrations at news studios in New York City and Washington, D.C. The massive national political realignment now taking place may be one source of these surprising upsets. Yet still, to have pulled so many rabbits out of his hat like this, nobody can deny that Biden is a first-rate campaigner and politician, the likes of which America has never before seen. Let’s break down just how unique his political voodoo has been in 2020.
1. 80 Million Votes
Holy moly! A lot of Americans turned out for a Washington politician who’s been in office for nearly 50 years. Consider this: no incumbent president in nearly a century and a half has gained votes in a re-election campaign and still lost. President Trump gained more than ten million votes since his 2016 victory, but Biden’s appeal was so substantial that it overcame President Trump’s record support among minority voters. Biden also shattered Barack Obama’s own popular vote totals, really calling into question whether it was not perhaps Biden who pulled Obama across the finish lines in 2008 and 2012. Proving how sharp his political instincts are, the former VP managed to gather a record number of votes while consistently trailing President Trump in measures of voter enthusiasm. Biden was so savvy that he motivated voters unenthusiastic about his campaign to vote for him in record numbers.
2. Winning Despite Losing Most Bellwether Counties
Biden is set to become the first president in 60 years to lose the states of Ohio and Florida on his way to election. For a century, these states have consistently predicted the national outcome, and they have been considered roughly representative of the American melting pot as a whole. Despite national polling giving Biden a lead in both states, he lost Ohio by eight points and Florida by more than three. For Biden to lose these key bellwethers by notable margins and still win the national election is newsworthy. Not since the Mafia allegedly aided John F. Kennedy in winning Illinois over Richard Nixon in 1960 has an American president pulled off this neat trick. Even more unbelievably, Biden is on his way to winning the White House after having lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country. The Wall Street Journal and The Epoch Times independently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have nearly perfect presidential voting records over the last 40 years. President Trump won every single bellwether county, except Clallam County in Washington. Whereas the former VP picked up Clallam by about three points, President Trump’s margin of victory in the other 18 counties averaged over 16 points. In a larger list of 58 bellwether counties that have correctly picked the president since 2000, Trump won 51 of them by an average of 15 points, while the other seven went to Biden by around four points. Bellwether counties overwhelmingly chose President Trump, but Biden found a path to victory anyway.
3. Biden Trailed Clinton Except in a Select Few Cities
Patrick Basham, a pollster with an accurate track record and the director of the Democracy Institute in D.C., highlighted two observations made by fellow colleagues, polling guru Richard Baris of Big Data Poll and Washington Post election analyst Robert Barnes. Baris noted a statistical oddity from 2020’s election returns: “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.” Barnes added that in those “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.” In the states that mattered most, so many mail-in ballots poured in for Biden from the cities that he put up record-breaking numbers and overturned state totals that looked like comfortable leads for President Trump. If Democrats succeed in eliminating the Electoral College, Biden’s magic formula for churning out overwhelming vote totals in a handful of cities should make the Democrats unbeatable.
4. Biden Won Despite Democrat Losses Everywhere Else
Randy DeSoto noted in The Western Journal that “Donald Trump was pretty much the only incumbent president in U.S. history to lose his re-election while his own party gained seats in the House of Representatives.” Now that’s a Biden miracle! In 2020, The Cook Political Report and The New York Times rated 27 House seats as toss-ups going into Election Day. Right now, Republicans appear to have won all 27. Democrats failed to flip a single state house chamber, while Republicans flipped both the House and Senate in New Hampshire and expanded their dominance of state legislatures across the country. Christina Polizzi, a spokesperson for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, went so far as to state: “It’s clear that Trump isn’t an anchor for the Republican legislative candidates. He’s a buoy.” Amazingly, Biden beat the guy who lifted all other Republicans to victory. Now that’s historic!
5. Biden Overcame Trump’s Commanding Primary Vote
In the past, primary vote totals have been remarkably accurate in predicting general election winners. Political analyst David Chapman highlighted three historical facts before the election. First, no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election. Second, President Trump received 94 percent of the primary vote, which is the fourth highest of all time (higher than Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Clinton, or Obama). In fact, Trump is only one of five incumbents since 1912 to receive more than 90 percent of the primary vote. Third, Trump set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent when more than 18 million people turned out for him in 2020 (the previous record, held by Bill Clinton, was half that number). For Biden to prevail in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the primaries, turns a century’s worth of prior election data on its head. Joe Biden achieved the impossible. It’s interesting that many more journalists aren’t pointing that out.
User avatar
Posts: 2106283
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


  • Similar Topics
    Last post

Return to Politics

Mobile Device
  • 1
    Free Classified Ads
    There are 3 ways to advertise - your choice: you can place free ads in a forum topic, in the classified display ads section, or you may start your own free blog. Please select the appropriate category and forum for the ad content before you post. Do not spam.
    Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware. Deal at your own risk and peril.
  • Advertisement