• Advertisement
To advertise, place classifieds free ads by category in a forum as a new topic, or in the classified display ads section, or start a classifieds free blog.

Florida Carry Asks SCOTUS to Rule on Open Carry Outside the Home

Florida Carry Asks SCOTUS to Rule on Open Carry Outside the Home

Postby smix » Tue Jul 11, 2017 7:58 am

Florida Carry Asks SCOTUS to Rule on Open Carry Outside the Home
Breitbart News

URL: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... side-home/
Category: Legal
Published: July 10, 2017

Description: Florida Carry is asking the Supreme Court of the United States to rule on open carry outside the home via David Lee Norman v. State of Florida. Norman is a concealed carry permit holder who was confronted at gunpoint, frisked, and handcuffed by police because the gun on his hip was visible as he walked beside U.S. Highway 1. He “was charged with open carrying of a weapon.” He appealed his conviction, which was upheld by the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida and, on March 2, 2017, the Fourth District’s decision was upheld by the Florida Supreme Court. Norman is now appealing his case to SCOTUS and Florida Carry is funding the appeal. According to the filing–which Breitbart News possesses–the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms “does not guarantee a right openly to carry a firearm in public.” The court therefore upheld “Norman’s conviction for openly carrying a firearm on his person.” Justice Charles Canady dissented from the majority of his Florida Supreme Court colleagues, writing,
The Second Amendment right…encompasses “being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.” This is reinforced by the statement in McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)…that Heller “held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense.” The “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, [is] to “be armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

Canady stressed that the right to be armed “for the purpose of self-defense” (McDonald) must “necessarily [encompass] the right to carry arms in public.” He also showed that “Heller explained that in Nunn v. State ‘the Georgia Supreme Court construed the Second Amendment as protecting the “natural right of self-defence,” and therefore struck down a ban on carrying pistols openly.’” Norman is now asking SCOTUS to issue of write of certiorari, whereby the ruling upholding his conviction would be reviewed and a definite ruling on the right to openly bear arms for self-defense outside one’s home may result. The appeal comes just weeks after Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in SCOTUS’s decision to take Peruta v California for review. Peruta revolves around California’s requirement that concealed carry applicants show “good cause” for wanting to carry a gun before the state will issue them a concealed permit. Thomas said SCOTUS’s refusal to hear the case was “indefensible.” As it stands, Peruta only recognizes a right to carry a gun inside one’s home for self-defense. Thomas wrote, “I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen.” Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Thomas in Peruta dissent.
User avatar
Posts: 1789557
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

  • Similar Topics
    Last post

Return to Firearms & Weapons

Mobile Device
  • 1
    Free Classified Ads
    There are 3 ways to advertise - your choice: you can place free ads in a forum topic, in the classified display ads section, or you may start your own free blog. Please select the appropriate category and forum for the ad content before you post. Do not spam.
    Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware. Deal at your own risk and peril.
  • Advertisement